Literature DB >> 12612387

Early and late reactions following the use of iopamidol 340, iomeprol 350 and iodixanol 320 in cardiac catheterization.

A G C Sutton1, P Finn, P G Campbell, D J A Price, J A Hall, M J Stewart, A Davies, N J Linker, M A De Belder.   

Abstract

GOAL: To investigate the incidence of early (< 24 hours) and late (> 24 hours to 7 days) reactions to 3 contrast agents commonly used in cardiac catheterization. METHODS AND
RESULTS: A total of 2,108 patients undergoing cardiac catheterization in a Regional Cardiothoracic Unit were randomly assigned to receive 1 of 3 commonly used contrast agents in a prospective, double-blind study. The contrast agents were iopamidol 340 (Niopam ), a nonionic monomer; iomeprol 350 (Iomeron ), a nonionic dimer; and iodixanol 320 (Visipaque ), a nonionic dimer. The main outcome measures were the incidence of early (< 24 hours) reactions following catheterization and the incidence of late (24 hours to 7 days) reactions. Early reactions, excluding patients with heat on left ventriculography as the sole symptom, were relatively common (7.4%), but there was no significant difference between the 3 agents (p = 0.35). Late skin reactions, excluding reactions solely at the site of the arterial puncture and continuations of early urticarial reactions, were also relatively common (5.4%), but the incidence differed between the 3 agents. Such reactions occurred in 2.7% of those receiving iopamidol 340 (Niopam ), 3.5% of those receiving iomeprol 350 (Iomeron ) and 10.4% of those receiving iodixanol 320 (Visipaque ) (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: The incidence of early adverse reactions is similar with these 3 contrast agents. However, late skin reactions are significantly more common with iodixanol 320 (Visipaque ) than with the other 2 agents. Although such reactions were rarely troublesome, patients should be advised accordingly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12612387

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Invasive Cardiol        ISSN: 1042-3931            Impact factor:   2.022


  12 in total

1.  Late adverse reactions to intravascular iodine based contrast media: an update.

Authors:  Marie-France Bellin; Fulvio Stacul; Judith A W Webb; Henrik S Thomsen; Sameh K Morcos; Torsten Almén; Peter Aspelin; Olivier Clement; Gertraud Heinz-Peer; Peter Reimer; Aart van der Molen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-07-16       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Patient discomfort associated with the use of intra-arterial iodinated contrast media: a meta-analysis of comparative randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Peter A McCullough; Patrizio Capasso
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 1.930

3.  Safety and tolerability of iopromide in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization: real-world multicenter experience with 17,513 patients from the TRUST trial.

Authors:  Ji-Yan Chen; Yong Liu; Ying-Ling Zhou; Ning Tan; Bin Zhang; Ping-Yan Chen; Li-Bing Chen
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Delayed adverse reaction to contrast-enhanced CT: a prospective single-center study comparison to control group without enhancement.

Authors:  Shaun Loh; Sepideh Bagheri; Richard W Katzberg; Maxwell A Fung; Chin-Shang Li
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Novel risk model for predicting acute adverse drug reactions following cardiac catheterization from TRUST study (The Safety and toleRability of UltraviSt in Patients Undergoing Cardiac CaTheterization).

Authors:  Yibo He; Yuming Huang; Junqing Yang; Jin Liu; Guoli Sun; Feier Song; Shiqun Chen; Ning Tan; Zhonghan Ni; Yong Liu; Jiyan Chen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Safety aspects of iodinated contrast media related to their physicochemical properties: a pharmacoepidemiology study in two Tuscany hospitals.

Authors:  Francesco Lapi; Enrica Cecchi; Claudio Pedone; Francesco Attanasio; Grazia Banchelli; Alfredo Vannacci; Marina Di Pirro; Martina Moschini; Valentina Berni; Rosanna Matucci; Elisabetta Cini; Antonino Scalia; Enrico Tendi; Alessandro Mugelli
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Are there any differences in acute adverse reactions among five low-osmolar non-ionic iodinated contrast media?

Authors:  Tatsuya Gomi; Masashi Nagamoto; Makoto Hasegawa; Asako Katoh; Miki Sugiyama; Nozomu Murata; Toshiyuki Kunihiro; Ehiichi Kohda
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  Current understanding of contrast media reactions and implications for clinical management.

Authors:  Marc J Meth; Howard I Maibach
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.228

Review 9.  Side effects of radiographic contrast media: pathogenesis, risk factors, and prevention.

Authors:  Michele Andreucci; Richard Solomon; Adis Tasanarong
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-05-11       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Comparison of allergic adverse effects and contrast enhancement between iodixanol and iopromide.

Authors:  Farideh Gharekhanloo; Saadat Torabian
Journal:  Iran J Radiol       Date:  2012-06-30       Impact factor: 0.212

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.