Literature DB >> 1261186

Pros and cons of subpectoral implantation.

J Papillon.   

Abstract

At the present time, there is no universally accepted surgical technique or prosthesis for augmenting breast volume. Each surgeon has to choose with regard to shape, consistency, and volume, according to his own conviction and respecting his patient's priorities. These priorities will vary with age, profession, sexual habits, and marital and social status. In order to get the best possible results, the plastic surgeon should be adept at alternative methods and should not be restricted to one technique or one prosthesis. Patients vary considerably so our methods should be diversified. Our subpectoral implantations have given us better results than our retroglandular ones, which have been performed during the same period of time and with the same prosthesis. Consequently, retropectoral implantation is still our preferred procedure. We think that this technique, with its proper indications, deserves wider application.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1976        PMID: 1261186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Plast Surg        ISSN: 0094-1298            Impact factor:   2.017


  6 in total

1.  Asymmetry of the breast and the thoracic cage : A brief presentation of cases with their operative treatment.

Authors:  C Perras
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 2.326

2.  Immediate reconstruction after subcutaneous mastectomy.

Authors:  G F Maillard; L J Garey
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.326

3.  Subcutaneous mastectomy with immediate prosthetic implantation.

Authors:  M J Timmons
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  The management of severe capsular contractures following breast augmentation.

Authors:  S Hoffman
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 2.326

5.  The place of subcutaneous mastectomy with immediate silicone prosthetic implantation in diseases of the breast.

Authors:  K G Burnand; A S Bulman; A G Nash
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  A critical look at capsule contracture in subglandular versus subpectoral mammary augmentation.

Authors:  C L Puckett; G H Croll; C A Reichel; M J Concannon
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.326

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.