Literature DB >> 12610184

Long-term survival of patients with supraclavicular metastases at diagnosis of breast cancer.

Ivo A Olivotto1, Boon Chua, Sharon J Allan, Caroline H Speers, Stephen Chia, Joseph Ragaz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with supraclavicular metastases at diagnosis of breast cancer were classified between 1987 and 2002 as having stage M(1) breast cancer according to the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) system. The 2003 edition of the TNM staging guidelines has classified such patients as having stage IIIC disease. To determine relative prognosis, we compared long-term survival in a population-based cohort of patients with isolated supraclavicular metastases (nodal-M(1)) to outcomes of patients with stage IIIB or M(1) (other) disease at presentation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Among patients with breast cancer and known tumor stage referred to the British Columbia Cancer Agency from 1976 to 1985, 336 IIIB, 233 M(1), and 51 nodal-M(1) patients were identified. Actuarial overall and breast cancer-specific survival rates were determined to 20 years.
RESULTS: Overall survival at 20 years was 13.2% for nodal-M(1) cases (95% confidence interval [CI], 5% to 26%), 9.4% for IIIB cases (95% CI, 6% to 14%), and 1.3% for M(1) (other) cases (95% CI, 0.4% to 3.5%; log-rank P <.0005). Overall survival was similar between nodal-M(1) and IIIB cases (P =.27). Breast cancer-specific survival at 20 years was 24.1% for nodal-M(1) cases (95% CI, 13% to 37%), 30.2% for IIIB cases (95% CI, 23% to 38%), and 3.9% for M(1) (other) cases (95% CI, 2% to 8%; log-rank P <.0005). Breast cancer-specific survival was significantly different for nodal-M(1) cases compared with either IIIB or M(1) (other) cases (P =.008 for both).
CONCLUSION: Patients with supraclavicular metastases at diagnosis have significantly better outcomes than patients with M(1) (other) disease and overall survival similar to patients with IIIB disease. Reclassification as stage IIIC is appropriate for patients with breast cancer who present with supraclavicular nodal metastases alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12610184     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2003.11.105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  26 in total

Review 1.  Cervical lymph node metastases from remote primary tumor sites.

Authors:  Fernando López; Juan P Rodrigo; Carl E Silver; Missak Haigentz; Justin A Bishop; Primož Strojan; Dana M Hartl; Patrick J Bradley; William M Mendenhall; Carlos Suárez; Robert P Takes; Marc Hamoir; K Thomas Robbins; Ashok R Shaha; Jochen A Werner; Alessandra Rinaldo; Alfio Ferlito
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 3.147

2.  Surgery of the Primary Tumor Offers Survival Benefits of Breast Cancer with Synchronous Ipsilateral Supraclavicular Lymph Node Metastasis.

Authors:  Qi-Tong Chen; Li-Yun Zeng; Deng-Jie Ouyang; Piao Zhao; Qiong-Yan Zou; Lei Pei; Na Luo; Wen-Jun Yi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Comparison between surgery plus radiotherapy and radiotherapy alone in treating breast cancer patients with ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node metastasis.

Authors:  Xian-Fu Sun; Ying-Jie Wang; Tao Huang; Lian-Jie Niu; Qiang Zhang; Zhen-Zhen Liu
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2020-10

Review 4.  Metastatic disease in head & neck oncology.

Authors:  Paolo Pisani; Mario Airoldi; Anastasia Allais; Paolo Aluffi Valletti; Mariapina Battista; Marco Benazzo; Roberto Briatore; Salvatore Cacciola; Salvatore Cocuzza; Andrea Colombo; Bice Conti; Alberto Costanzo; Laura Della Vecchia; Nerina Denaro; Cesare Fantozzi; Danilo Galizia; Massimiliano Garzaro; Ida Genta; Gabriela Alejandra Iasi; Marco Krengli; Vincenzo Landolfo; Giovanni Vittorio Lanza; Mauro Magnano; Maurizio Mancuso; Roberto Maroldi; Laura Masini; Marco Carlo Merlano; Marco Piemonte; Silvia Pisani; Adriele Prina-Mello; Luca Prioglio; Maria Gabriella Rugiu; Felice Scasso; Agostino Serra; Guido Valente; Micol Zannetti; Angelo Zigliani
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 2.124

5.  Stridor as the First Presentation of Metastatic Breast Cancer that Was Managed with Chemotherapy: a Case Report.

Authors:  Ashraf Khater; Adel El-Badrawy; Mohamed Awad Ebrahem
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-01-25

Review 6.  Management of patients with locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Lisa A Newman
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.075

7.  Dynamics of circulating tumor DNA during postoperative radiotherapy in patients with residual triple-negative breast cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Haeyoung Kim; Yeon Jeong Kim; Donghyun Park; Woong-Yang Park; Doo Ho Choi; Won Park; Won Kyung Cho; Nalee Kim
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Cervical Lymph Nodes: A Hotbed For Metastasis in Malignancy.

Authors:  Rajnish Nagarkar; Ashvin Wagh; Gauri Kokane; Sirshendu Roy; Srikant Vanjari
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-04-27

9.  What is the burden of axillary disease after neoadjuvant therapy in women with locally advanced breast cancer?

Authors:  C Cox; C M Holloway; A Shaheta; S Nofech-Mozes; F C Wright
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 10.  Clinical practice guidelines for the care and treatment of breast cancer: 15. Treatment for women with stage III or locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Tamara Shenkier; Lorna Weir; Mark Levine; Ivo Olivotto; Timothy Whelan; Leonard Reyno
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-03-16       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.