Literature DB >> 12608885

Consumer adverse drug reaction reporting: a new step in pharmacovigilance?

Kees van Grootheest1, Linda de Graaf, Lolkje T W de Jong-van den Berg.   

Abstract

The direct reporting of adverse drug reactions by patients is becoming an increasingly important topic for discussion in the world of pharmacovigilance. At this time, few countries accept consumer reports. We present an overview of experiences with consumer reporting in various countries of the world. The potential contribution of patient reports of adverse drug reactions is discussed, both in terms of their qualitative and quantitative contribution. The crucial question is one of whether patient reports will increase the number and quality of the reports submitted and/or lead to a more timely detection of signals of possible adverse reactions, thus contributing to an enhancement of the existing methods of drug safety monitoring. To date, the data available are insufficient to establish such added value.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12608885     DOI: 10.2165/00002018-200326040-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Saf        ISSN: 0114-5916            Impact factor:   5.606


  15 in total

1.  NHS introduces new patient safety agency.

Authors:  S Mayor
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-04-28

2.  Spontaneous reporting--of what? Clinical concerns about drugs.

Authors:  I R Edwards
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Adverse drug reaction monitoring and the Internet: evaluation of the use of the Internet by French Pharmacovigilance Centres and a non-exhaustive survey of websites of interest for collecting information about adverse drug reaction.

Authors:  P Morel; B Vandel
Journal:  Therapie       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.070

4.  150 years of pharmacovigilance.

Authors:  P Routledge
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-04-18       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  How well can patients discriminate drug-related side effects from extraneous new symptoms?

Authors:  B L Solovitz; S Fisher; S G Bryant; R M Kluge
Journal:  Psychopharmacol Bull       Date:  1987

6.  Adverse drug events in hospitalized patients. A comparison of doctors, nurses and patients as sources of reports.

Authors:  P M van den Bemt; A C Egberts; A W Lenderink; J M Verzijl; K A Simons; W S van der Pol; H G Leufkens
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  How do pharmaceutical companies handle consumer adverse drug reaction reports? An overview based on a survey of French drug safety managers and officers.

Authors:  P Fleuranceau-Morel
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.890

8.  Patient reporting of potential adverse drug reactions: a methodological study.

Authors:  N Jarernsiripornkul; J Krska; P A G Capps; R M E Richards; A Lee
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.335

9.  ADR related questions received by a telephone medicines information service and ADRs received by a spontaneous ADR reporting system: a comparison regarding patients and drugs.

Authors:  A C Egberts; F H de Koning; R H Meyboom; H G Leufkens
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 2.890

10.  Patients as a direct source of information on adverse drug reactions.

Authors:  A S Mitchell; D A Henry; R Sanson-Fisher; D L O'Connell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988-10-08
View more
  37 in total

1.  How patient reporters identify adverse drug reactions: a qualitative study of reporting via the UK Yellow Card Scheme.

Authors:  Janet Krska; Claire Anderson; Elizabeth Murphy; Anthony J Avery
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 2.  Pharmacovigilance of herbal medicines : a UK perspective.

Authors:  Joanne Barnes
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  Do pharmacists' reports of adverse drug reactions reflect patients' concerns?

Authors:  Kees van Grootheest; Eugène P van Puijenbroek; Lolkje T W de Jong-van den Berg
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2004-06

4.  Monitoring adverse events of the vaccination campaign against influenza A (H1N1) in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Eugène P van Puijenbroek; Nancy Broos; Kees van Grootheest
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 5.606

5.  Community pharmacists' views on adverse drug reactions reporting in Malaysia: a pilot study.

Authors:  Kang-Nee Ting; Dane Michael Stratton-Powell; Claire Anderson
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2010-03-25

6.  What is drug safety?: celebrating 20 years of the Drug Safety journal.

Authors:  I Ralph Edwards
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.606

7.  The influence of primary care prescribing rates for new drugs on spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions.

Authors:  Richard C Clark; Simon R J Maxwell; Sheena Kerr; Melinda Cuthbert; Duncan Buchanan; Doug Steinke; David J Webb; Nicholas D Bateman
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.606

8.  The importance of direct patient reporting of suspected adverse drug reactions: a patient perspective.

Authors:  Claire Anderson; Janet Krska; Elizabeth Murphy; Anthony Avery
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 9.  Patient reporting of suspected adverse drug reactions: a review of published literature and international experience.

Authors:  A Blenkinsopp; P Wilkie; M Wang; P A Routledge
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.335

10.  Consumer reporting of adverse drug reactions: a retrospective analysis of the Danish adverse drug reaction database from 2004 to 2006.

Authors:  Lise Aagaard; Lars Hougaard Nielsen; Ebba Holme Hansen
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.606

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.