Literature DB >> 12608729

Long-term follow-up of early treatment with reverse headgear.

Urban Hägg1, Agnes Tse, Margareta Bendeus, A Bakr M Rabie.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the long-term outcome of treatment with reverse headgear in young individuals with a reverse overjet and a skeletal Class III malocclusion due to maxillary deficiency. Lateral cephalograms were obtained from 21 subjects (8.4 +/- 1.5 years; 17 girls and four boys) of an original sample of 30 consecutively treated young patients who were followed for 8 years after active treatment. There was a drop-out of nine subjects; their dentofacial morphology at start of treatment did not differ from those who remained in the study. The remaining subjects were divided into a stable group and a relapse group. The results revealed that two out of three patients maintained a positive overjet 8 years after active treatment. The immediate treatment outcome in the sagittal plane was the same for the stable and relapse groups, but lower face height increased (P < 0.08) and the mandibular plane angle opened (P < 0.05) more in the relapse group. During the 8-year follow-up period, the dental compensation was similar in both groups, but the mandible outgrew the maxilla by four times in the relapse group, compared with twice that in the stable group. In young individuals diagnosed with maxillary deficiency treated with reverse headgear and who have an immediate positive treatment response, there is a potential risk that about one-third might be candidates for orthognathic surgery later in life, because of an unfavourable growth pattern.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12608729     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/25.1.95

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  13 in total

1.  Long-term stability of maxillary protraction therapy in Class III patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Yixin Zhang; Zhen Fu; Haichao Jia; Yiping Huang; Xiaobei Li; Hao Liu; Weiran Li
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Stability of maxillary protraction therapy in children with Class III malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yifan Lin; Runzhi Guo; Liyu Hou; Zhen Fu; Weiran Li
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-02-10       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Three-dimensional analysis of maxillary protraction with intermaxillary elastics to miniplates.

Authors:  Gavin C Heymann; Lucia Cevidanes; Marie Cornelis; Hugo J De Clerck; J F Camilla Tulloch
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  Comparison of facemask therapy effects using skeletal and tooth-borne anchorage.

Authors:  Hyeon-Jong Lee; Dong-Soon Choi; Insan Jang; Bong-Kuen Cha
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Dentofacial effects of two facemask therapies for maxillary protraction.

Authors:  Yuan Shu Ge; Jin Liu; Lin Chen; Jian Li Han; Xin Guo
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 6.  Effectiveness of TAD-anchored maxillary protraction in late mixed dentition.

Authors:  Xiaoxia Feng; Jianhua Li; Yu Li; Zhihe Zhao; Sen Zhao; Jue Wang
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Sutural deformation during bone-anchored maxillary protraction.

Authors:  Taylor Rae Vracar; Wanda Claro; Michael Eli Vracar; Randall Stetson Jenkins; Lane Bland; Ayman Al Dayeh
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2021-05-21

8.  Class III treatment using facial mask: stability after 10 years.

Authors:  Adilson Luiz Ramos
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct

9.  Analysis of pretreatment factors associated with stability in early class III treatment.

Authors:  Yasuko Inoue; Toru Deguchi; James K Hartsfield; Wakako Tome; Noriyuki Kitai
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 2.750

10.  Comparison of two maxillary protraction protocols: tooth-borne versus bone-anchored protraction facemask treatment.

Authors:  Peter Ngan; Benedict Wilmes; Dieter Drescher; Chris Martin; Bryan Weaver; Erdogan Gunel
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 2.750

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.