Literature DB >> 12608623

The validity of general health questionnaires, GHQ-12 and GHQ-28, in mental health studies of working people.

Zofia Makowska1, Dorota Merecz, Agnieszka Mościcka, Wojciech Kolasa.   

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to determine such cut-off points in the scores of General Health Questionnaires (GHQ-12 and GHQ-28) that allow for optimal identification of people with mental health disorders in the Polish working population attending primary health care settings. The groups under the study covered 419 and 392 patients for GHQ-12, and GHQ-28, respectively. In the GHQ-12 group, 90 and in the GHQ-28 group, 80 subjects filled in the questionnaires and agreed to participate in the second stage of the study--a psychiatric interview. The criterion validity of the GHQs was a mental health diagnosis, based on the Munich version of Composite International Diagnostic Interview. The complete computerized version of interview, covering all diagnostic sections, has been adopted. In the mental health diagnosis only disorders, which currently troubled patients were taken into consideration and disorders which created problems in the distant past were excluded. In the group covered by GHQ-12 examination, 55.6% of persons had at least one type of mental disorder diagnosed, based on the criteria of both Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) and the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10). In the GHQ-28 group, the percentage of persons with mental disorders was 47.5%. After excluding patients with nicotine dependence disorder only, the frequency of mental health problems decreased to 45.5% and 33.8%, respectively. The proposed cut-off points, 2/3 points for GHQ-12 and 5/6 points for GHQ-28, were established at the level of the highest possible sensitivity and specificity not lower than 75%. These principals have been accepted for a practical reason, as the acceptance of the lower level of specificity forces medical practitioners to devote too much time to practically healthy people. At the above mentioned cut-off points for GHQ-12 sensitivity is 64% and specificity--79%, while for GHQ-28 the values are 59% and 75%, respectively. These validity coefficients were calculated from distributions of groups, from which persons with nicotine dependence as the only disorder were excluded. Incorporation of these people in the whole sample reduced the questionnaires' validity. Modification of responses scoring from the standard one--GHQ to CGHQ has not improved the validity of questionnaires. Lower validity coefficients of GHQ-28, in comparison to GHQ-12 validity are the effect of greater influence of somatic disease on the results acquired in this scale version of the questionnaire.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12608623

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Occup Med Environ Health        ISSN: 1232-1087            Impact factor:   1.843


  49 in total

1.  Reconsidering the role of social disadvantage in physical and mental health: stressful life events, health behaviors, race, and depression.

Authors:  Briana Mezuk; Jane A Rafferty; Kiarri N Kershaw; Darrell Hudson; Cleopatra M Abdou; Hedwig Lee; William W Eaton; James S Jackson
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  The Effect of Postpartum Depression and Current Mental Health Problems of the Mother on Child Behaviour at Eight Years.

Authors:  R Closa-Monasterolo; M Gispert-Llaurado; J Canals; V Luque; M Zaragoza-Jordana; B Koletzko; V Grote; M Weber; D Gruszfeld; K Szott; E Verduci; A ReDionigi; J Hoyos; G Brasselle; J Escribano Subías
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2017-07

3.  Economic hardships in adulthood and mental health in Sweden. The Swedish National Public Health Survey 2009.

Authors:  Johanna Ahnquist; Sarah P Wamala
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Immigration, work and health in Spain: the influence of legal status and employment contract on reported health indicators.

Authors:  Emily Sousa; Andrés Agudelo-Suárez; Fernando G Benavides; Marc Schenker; Ana M García; Joan Benach; Carlos Delclos; María José López-Jacob; Carlos Ruiz-Frutos; Elena Ronda-Pérez; Victoria Porthé
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2010-04-17       Impact factor: 3.380

5.  Patient involvement in assessing consultation quality: a quantitative study of the Patient Enablement Instrument in Poland.

Authors:  Teresa R B Pawlikowska; Jeremy J Walker; Pawel R Nowak; Wieslawa Szumilo-Grzesik
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  The association between disaster-related experiences and mental health outcomes among drug using African American Hurricane Katrina evacuees.

Authors:  Alice Cepeda; Jarron M Saint Onge; Charles Kaplan; Avelardo Valdez
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2010-01-21

7.  Somatic distress among Kosovar civilian war survivors: relationship to trauma exposure and the mediating role of experiential avoidance.

Authors:  Nexhmedin Morina; Julian D Ford; Anne Katrin Risch; Besim Morina; Ulrich Stangier
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 4.328

8.  Economic difficulties and common mental disorders among Finnish and British white-collar employees: the contribution of social and behavioural factors.

Authors:  E Laaksonen; P Martikainen; T Lallukka; E Lahelma; J Ferrie; O Rahkonen; M Marmot; J Head
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2009-02-15       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 9.  The Association of Physical (in)Activity with Mental Health. Differences between Elder and Younger Populations: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Laia Maynou; Helena M Hernández-Pizarro; María Errea Rodríguez
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Coping Strategies and Psychopathological Responses Among Medical and Non-medical Professionals - a Cross-Sectional Online Survey.

Authors:  Marta Ciułkowicz; Julian Maciaszek; Błażej Misiak; Anna Pałȩga; Joanna Rymaszewska; Dorota Maria Szcześniak
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 4.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.