Literature DB >> 12608607

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy optimization with gEUD-guided dose-volume objectives.

Qiuwen Wu1, David Djajaputra, Yan Wu, Jining Zhou, Helen H Liu, Radhe Mohan.   

Abstract

Currently, most intensity-modulated radiation therapy systems use dose-volume (DV)-based objectives. Although acceptable plans can be generated using these objectives, much trial and error is necessary to plan complex cases with many structures because numerous parameters need to be adjusted. An objective function that makes use of a generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD) was developed recently that has the advantage of involving simple formulae and fewer parameters. In addition, not only does the gEUD-based optimization provide the same coverage of the target, it provides significantly better protection of critical structures. However, gEUD-based optimization may not be superior once dose distributions and dose-volume histograms (DVHs) are used to evaluate the plan. Moreover, it is difficult to fine-tune the DVH with gEUD-based optimization. In this paper, we propose a method for combining the gEUD-based and DV-based optimization approaches to overcome these limitations. In this method, the gEUD optimization is performed initially to search for a solution that meets or exceeds most of the treatment objectives. Depending on the requirements, DV-based optimization with a gradient technique is then used to fine-tune the DVHs. The DV constraints are specified according to the gEUD plan, and the initial intensities are obtained from the gEUD plan as well. We demonstrated this technique in two clinical cases: aprostate cancer and ahead and neck cancer case. Compared with the DV-optimized plan, the gEUD plan provided better protection of critical structures and the target coverage was similar. However, homogeneities were slightly poorer. The gEUD plan was then fine-tuned with DV constraints, and the resulting plan was superior to the other plans in terms of the dose distributions. The planning time was significantly reduced as well. This technique is an effective means of optimizing individualized treatment plans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12608607     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/48/3/301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  12 in total

1.  Evaluating target cold spots by the use of tail EUDs.

Authors:  Thomas Bortfeld; David Craft; James F Dempsey; Tarek Halabi; H Edwin Romeijn
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-04-25       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Dosimetric advantages of generalised equivalent uniform dose-based optimisation on dose-volume objectives in intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning for bilateral breast cancer.

Authors:  T-F Lee; H-M Ting; P-J Chao; H-Y Wang; C-S Shieh; M-F Horng; J-M Wu; S-A Yeh; M-Y Cho; E-Y Huang; Y-J Huang; H-C Chen; F-M Fang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Test the Effectiveness of Quantitative Linear-Quadratic-Based (qLQB) Model on Evaluating Irradiation-Induced Liver Injury (ILI) Against Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP).

Authors:  Han Bai; Li Wang; Wenhui Li; Xuhong Liu; Yaoxiong Xia; Li Chang
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 2.658

4.  Isodose feature-preserving voxelization (IFPV) for radiation therapy treatment planning.

Authors:  Hongcheng Liu; Lei Xing
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  The use of biologically related model (Eclipse) for the intensity-modulated radiation therapy planning of nasopharyngeal carcinomas.

Authors:  Monica W K Kan; Lucullus H T Leung; Peter K N Yu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The benefit of using bladder sub-volume equivalent uniform dose constraints in prostate intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning.

Authors:  Jian Zhu; Antoine Simon; Pascal Haigron; Caroline Lafond; Oscar Acosta; Huazhong Shu; Joel Castelli; Baosheng Li; Renaud De Crevoisier
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 7.  Modeling Radiotherapy Induced Normal Tissue Complications: An Overview beyond Phenomenological Models.

Authors:  Marco D'Andrea; Marcello Benassi; Lidia Strigari
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.238

8.  Optimization of treatment planning workflow and tumor coverage during daily adaptive magnetic resonance image guided radiation therapy (MR-IGRT) of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Sven Olberg; Olga Green; Bin Cai; Deshan Yang; Vivian Rodriguez; Hao Zhang; Jin Sung Kim; Parag J Parikh; Sasa Mutic; Justin C Park
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-03-24       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  An integrated strategy of biological and physical constraints in biological optimization for cervical carcinoma.

Authors:  Ziwei Feng; Cheng Tao; Jian Zhu; Jinhu Chen; Gang Yu; Shaohua Qin; Yong Yin; Dengwang Li
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  A quality control method for intensity-modulated radiation therapy planning based on generalized equivalent uniform dose.

Authors:  Haowen Pang; Xiaoyang Sun; Bo Yang; Jingbo Wu
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.