BACKGROUND: Patients with ESRD are at increased risk for heart valve calcification. It has not been established whether hospitalized valvular heart disease (VHD) is a substantial barrier to renal transplantation (RT) after transplant listing, or whether VHD progresses after RT. METHODS: Using data from the USRDS, we studied 35,215 patients with ESRD enrolled on the renal transplant waiting list from July 1994 to June 1997. Cox non-proportional hazards regression models were used to calculate adjusted, time-dependent hazard ratios (HR) for RT and VHD. RESULTS: In comparison to maintenance dialysis (2.2/1,000 person years), RT was independently associated with a lower hazard for hospitalization for VHD (0.7/1,000 person years, HR 0.28, 95% confidence interval 0.17 - 0.47). Renal transplant recipients had much lower rates of VHD after transplant than before (rate ratio (RR) 0.49, 95% Cl 0.47 - 0.52). Patients with VHD were significantly less likely to receive RT (adjusted rate for RT 0.38, 95% CI 0.20 - 0.45) but patients who received valve replacement surgeries (VRS) were not affected (adjusted rate for RT 1.10, 95% CI 0.52 - 2.32, not significant). CONCLUSIONS: VHD is an uncommon but serious barrier to RT after listing, while VRS is not a significant barrier to RT. Established VHD does not appear to worsen after RT. Clinicians should consider giving increased attention to the detection and treatment of VHD during the pre-transplant evaluation.
BACKGROUND:Patients with ESRD are at increased risk for heart valve calcification. It has not been established whether hospitalized valvular heart disease (VHD) is a substantial barrier to renal transplantation (RT) after transplant listing, or whether VHD progresses after RT. METHODS: Using data from the USRDS, we studied 35,215 patients with ESRD enrolled on the renal transplant waiting list from July 1994 to June 1997. Cox non-proportional hazards regression models were used to calculate adjusted, time-dependent hazard ratios (HR) for RT and VHD. RESULTS: In comparison to maintenance dialysis (2.2/1,000 person years), RT was independently associated with a lower hazard for hospitalization for VHD (0.7/1,000 person years, HR 0.28, 95% confidence interval 0.17 - 0.47). Renal transplant recipients had much lower rates of VHD after transplant than before (rate ratio (RR) 0.49, 95% Cl 0.47 - 0.52). Patients with VHD were significantly less likely to receive RT (adjusted rate for RT 0.38, 95% CI 0.20 - 0.45) but patients who received valve replacement surgeries (VRS) were not affected (adjusted rate for RT 1.10, 95% CI 0.52 - 2.32, not significant). CONCLUSIONS: VHD is an uncommon but serious barrier to RT after listing, while VRS is not a significant barrier to RT. Established VHD does not appear to worsen after RT. Clinicians should consider giving increased attention to the detection and treatment of VHD during the pre-transplant evaluation.
Authors: G Schlieper; V Schwenger; A Remppis; T Keller; R Dechend; S Massberg; S Baldus; T Weinreich; G Hetzel; J Floege; F Mahfoud; D Fliser Journal: Internist (Berl) Date: 2017-05 Impact factor: 0.743
Authors: Jayson Rakesh Baman; Joseph Knapper; Zankhana Raval; Matthew E Harinstein; John J Friedewald; Kameswari Maganti; Michael J Cuttica; Michael I Abecassis; Ziad A Ali; Mihai Gheorghiade; James D Flaherty Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2019-09-25 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: David K Ngendahimana; Salil V Deo; Varun Sundaram; Krista L Lentine; Charles A Herzog; Laith Al Dahabreh; Titte R Srinivas; Kenneth D Chavin; Nagaraju Sarabu Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2021-02-18 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Minjeong Kim; Darae Kim; Juhan Lee; Dae-Young Kim; Jiwon Seo; Iksung Cho; Kyu Ha Huh; Geu-Ru Hong; Jong-Won Ha; Chi Young Shim Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2022-01-27
Authors: Navdeep K Bhatti; Keyvan Karimi Galougahi; Yehuda Paz; Tamim Nazif; Jeffrey W Moses; Martin B Leon; Gregg W Stone; Ajay J Kirtane; Dimitri Karmpaliotis; Sabahat Bokhari; Mark A Hardy; Geoffrey Dube; Sumit Mohan; Lloyd E Ratner; David J Cohen; Ziad A Ali Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2016-08-04 Impact factor: 5.501