Literature DB >> 12607161

Defending principlism well understood.

Michael Quante1, Andreas Vieth.   

Abstract

After presenting the current version of principlism, in the process repudiating a widespread deductivist misinterpretation, a fundamental metaethical disagreement is developed by outlining the deductivistic critique of principlism. Once the grounds for this critique have been understood, the dispute between casuistry, deductivism and principlism can be restructured, and the model of "application" proven to be the central difference. In the concluding section it is argued that principlism is the most attractive position, if the perceptual model of weak intuitionism is made more explicit.

Keywords:  Bioethics and Professional Ethics; Philosophical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12607161     DOI: 10.1076/jmep.27.6.621.13794

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Philos        ISSN: 0360-5310


  3 in total

Review 1.  What kind of doing is clinical ethics?

Authors:  George J Agich
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2005

Review 2.  Intuition and the junctures of judgment in decision procedures for clinical ethics.

Authors:  John K Davis
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2007-03-09

3.  Inclusive consultation: a hermeneutical approach to ethical deliberation in the clinical setting.

Authors:  Andreas Vieth
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2011-12
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.