BACKGROUND: The authors compared the effects of vasopressin fluid resuscitation on survival in a liver trauma model with uncontrolled and otherwise lethal hemorrhagic shock in pigs. METHODS: A midline laparotomy was performed on 23 domestic pigs, followed by an incision, and subsequent finger fraction across the right medial liver lobe. During hemorrhagic shock, animals were randomly assigned to receive either 0.4 U/kg vasopressin (n = 9), or fluid resuscitation (n = 7), or saline placebo (n = 7), respectively. A continuous infusion of 0.08 U x kg(-1) x min(-1) vasopressin in the vasopressin group, or normal saline was subsequently administered in the fluid resuscitation and saline placebo group, respectively. After 30 min of experimental therapy, bleeding was controlled by surgical intervention, and blood transfusion and rapid fluid infusion were subsequently performed. RESULTS: Maximum mean arterial blood pressure during experimental therapy in the vasopressin-treated animals was significantly higher than in the fluid resuscitation and saline placebo groups (mean +/- SD, 72 +/- 26 vs 38 +/- 16 vs 11 +/- 7 mmHg, respectively; P< 0.05). Subsequently, mean arterial blood pressure remained at approximately 40 mmHg in all vasopressin-treated animals, whereas mean arterial blood pressure in all fluid resuscitation and saline placebo pigs was close to aortic hydrostatic pressure (approximately 15 mmHg) within approximately 20 min of experimental therapy initiation. Total blood loss was significantly higher in the fluid resuscitation pigs compared with vasopressin or saline placebo after 10 min of experimental therapy (65 +/- 6 vs 42 +/- 4 vs 43 +/- 6 ml/kg, respectively; P< 0.05). Seven of seven fluid resuscitation, and seven of seven saline placebo pigs died within approximately 20 min of experimental therapy, while 8 of 9 vasopressin animals survived more than 7 days (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Vasopressin, but not fluid resuscitation or saline placebo, ensured survival with full recovery in this liver trauma model with uncontrolled and otherwise lethal hemorrhagic shock in pigs.
BACKGROUND: The authors compared the effects of vasopressin fluid resuscitation on survival in a liver trauma model with uncontrolled and otherwise lethal hemorrhagic shock in pigs. METHODS: A midline laparotomy was performed on 23 domestic pigs, followed by an incision, and subsequent finger fraction across the right medial liver lobe. During hemorrhagic shock, animals were randomly assigned to receive either 0.4 U/kg vasopressin (n = 9), or fluid resuscitation (n = 7), or saline placebo (n = 7), respectively. A continuous infusion of 0.08 U x kg(-1) x min(-1) vasopressin in the vasopressin group, or normal saline was subsequently administered in the fluid resuscitation and saline placebo group, respectively. After 30 min of experimental therapy, bleeding was controlled by surgical intervention, and blood transfusion and rapid fluid infusion were subsequently performed. RESULTS: Maximum mean arterial blood pressure during experimental therapy in the vasopressin-treated animals was significantly higher than in the fluid resuscitation and saline placebo groups (mean +/- SD, 72 +/- 26 vs 38 +/- 16 vs 11 +/- 7 mmHg, respectively; P< 0.05). Subsequently, mean arterial blood pressure remained at approximately 40 mmHg in all vasopressin-treated animals, whereas mean arterial blood pressure in all fluid resuscitation and saline placebo pigs was close to aortic hydrostatic pressure (approximately 15 mmHg) within approximately 20 min of experimental therapy initiation. Total blood loss was significantly higher in the fluid resuscitation pigs compared with vasopressin or saline placebo after 10 min of experimental therapy (65 +/- 6 vs 42 +/- 4 vs 43 +/- 6 ml/kg, respectively; P< 0.05). Seven of seven fluid resuscitation, and seven of seven saline placebo pigs died within approximately 20 min of experimental therapy, while 8 of 9 vasopressin animals survived more than 7 days (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS:Vasopressin, but not fluid resuscitation or saline placebo, ensured survival with full recovery in this liver trauma model with uncontrolled and otherwise lethal hemorrhagic shock in pigs.
Authors: Stephen M Cohn; Janet McCarthy; Ronald M Stewart; Rachelle B Jonas; Daniel L Dent; Joel E Michalek Journal: World J Surg Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Jan Küchler; Stephan Klaus; Ludger Bahlmann; Nils Onken; Alexander Keck; Emma Smith; Jan Gliemroth; Claudia Ditz Journal: Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Date: 2019-05-24 Impact factor: 3.693
Authors: Carrie A Sims; Daniel Holena; Patrick Kim; Jose Pascual; Brian Smith; Neils Martin; Mark Seamon; Adam Shiroff; Shariq Raza; Lewis Kaplan; Elena Grill; Nicole Zimmerman; Christopher Mason; Benjamin Abella; Patrick Reilly Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2019-11-01 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Sophie Dunberry-Poissant; Kim Gilbert; Caroline Bouchard; Frédérique Baril; Anne-Marie Cardinal; Sydnée L'Ecuyer; Mathieu Hylands; François Lamontagne; Guy Rousseau; Emmanuel Charbonney Journal: Intensive Care Med Exp Date: 2018-11-12
Authors: H G Lienhart; V Wenzel; J Braun; V Dörges; M Dünser; A Gries; W R Hasibeder; M Helm; R Lefering; T Schlechtriemen; H Trimmel; H Ulmer; W Ummenhofer; W G Voelckel; C Waydhas; K Lindner Journal: Anaesthesist Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 1.041
Authors: J Dave Barry; Dave Durkovich; Lee Cantrell; William Richardson; Tri Tong; Steve Offerman; Richard F Clark; David A Tanen; Saralyn Williams Journal: J Med Toxicol Date: 2005-12
Authors: R Kopp; J Andrassy; S Czerner; A Weidenhagen; R Weidenhagen; G Meimarakis; M Reiser; K W Jauch Journal: Anaesthesist Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 1.041