Literature DB >> 12606420

Cloned mice derived from embryonic stem cell karyoplasts and activated cytoplasts prepared by induced enucleation.

B Gasparrini1, S Gao, A Ainslie, J Fletcher, M McGarry, W A Ritchie, A J Springbett, E W Overström, I Wilmut, P A De Sousa.   

Abstract

Our objective was to induce enucleation (IE) of activated mouse oocytes to yield cytoplasts capable of supporting development following nuclear transfer. Fluorescence microscopy for microtubules, microfilaments, and DNA was used to evaluate meiotic resumption after ethanol activation and the effect of subsequent transient treatments with 0.4 micro g/ml of demecolcine. Using oocytes from B6D2F1 (C57BL/6 x DBA/2) donors, the success of IE of chromatin into polar bodies (PBs) was dependent on the duration of demecolcine treatment and the time that such treatment was initiated after activation. Similarly, variations in demecolcine treatment altered the proportions of oocytes exhibiting a reversible compartmentalization of chromatin into PBs. Treatment for 15 min begun immediately after activation yielded an optimized IE rate of 21% (n = 80) when oocytes were evaluated after overnight recovery in culture. With this protocol, 30-50% of oocytes were routinely scored as compartmentalized when assessed 90 min postactivation. No oocytes could be scored as such following overnight recovery, with 66% of treated oocytes cleaving to the 2-cell stage (n = 80). Activated cytoplasts were prepared by mechanical removal of PBs from oocytes whose chromatin had undergone IE or compartmentalization. These cytoplasts were compared with mechanically enucleated, metaphase (M) II cytoplasts whose activation was delayed in nuclear transfer experiments using HM-1 embryonic stem cells. Using oocytes from either B6D2F1 or B6CBAF1 (C57BL/6 x CBA) donors, the in vitro development of cloned embryos using activated cytoplasts was consistently inferior to that observed using MII cytoplasts. Live offspring were derived from both oocyte strains using the latter, whereas a single living mouse was cloned from activated B6CBAF1 cytoplasts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12606420     DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.102.008730

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Reprod        ISSN: 0006-3363            Impact factor:   4.285


  4 in total

1.  Mouse cloning and somatic cell reprogramming using electrofused blastomeres.

Authors:  Amjad Riaz; Xiaoyang Zhao; Xiangpeng Dai; Wei Li; Lei Liu; Haifeng Wan; Yang Yu; Liu Wang; Qi Zhou
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 25.617

2.  A comparative study on the efficiency of two enucleation methods in pig somatic cell nuclear transfer: effects of the squeezing and the aspiration methods.

Authors:  Eunsong Lee; Jose Estrada; Jorge A Piedrahita
Journal:  Anim Biotechnol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.282

3.  Reprogramming of round spermatids by the germinal vesicle cytoplasm in mice.

Authors:  Peng-Cheng Kong; Yan Zhu; Mei-Shan Wang; He-Ping Li; Xue-Jin Chen; Man-Xi Jiang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Effect of demecolcine-assisted enucleation on the MPF level and cyclin B1 distribution in porcine oocytes.

Authors:  Suo Li; Jin-Dan Kang; Jun-Xue Jin; Yu Hong; Hai-Ying Zhu; Long Jin; Qing-Shan Gao; Chang-Guo Yan; Cheng-Du Cui; Wen-Xue Li; Xi-Jun Yin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.