Literature DB >> 12605198

Head-elevated laryngoscopy position: improving laryngeal exposure during laryngoscopy by increasing head elevation.

Richard M Levitan1, C Crawford Mechem, E Andrew Ochroch, Frances S Shofer, Judd E Hollander.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the effect of increasing head elevation and neck flexion on the quality of laryngeal view during laryngoscopy.
METHODS: Laryngoscopy with a straight blade was performed on 7 fresh human cadavers. Laryngeal views were recorded with the direct laryngoscopy video system, and the laryngoscopy angle was measured throughout the procedure with an angle finder attached to the handle of the laryngoscope. Each cadaver had laryngoscopy initiated with the head lying flat on the table and with atlanto-occipital extension. The head was then progressively elevated as much as possible (the head-elevated laryngoscopy position), increasing neck flexion and the laryngoscopy angle. Three physicians blinded to the laryngoscopy angle graded the quality of laryngeal view using the percentage of glottic opening (POGO) score.
RESULTS: The laryngoscopy angle ranged from a mean of 32 degrees +/-8 degrees (1 SD) with the head flat on the table to a mean of 67 degrees +/-8 degrees with the head-elevated laryngoscopy position. The mean midposition laryngoscopy angle was 49 degrees +/-6 degrees. Comparing the 3 positions, mean POGO scores+/-1 SD significantly increased from 31%+/-10% (flat position) to 64%+/-12% (midposition) to 87%+/-13% (head-elevated laryngoscopy position). Both the midposition and the head-elevated laryngoscopy position compared with the flat position were statistically significant at a P value of less than.0001. The midposition also differed significantly from the head-elevated laryngoscopy position (P <.0007). Additionally, there was a significant linear relationship among the 3 positions (P <.0001).
CONCLUSION: Increasing head elevation and laryngoscopy angle (neck flexion) significantly improves POGO scores during laryngoscopy on fresh human cadavers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12605198     DOI: 10.1067/mem.2003.87

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  24 in total

1.  A comparison of direct laryngoscopic views depending on pillow height.

Authors:  Sang-Heon Park; Hee-Pyoung Park; Young-Tae Jeon; Jung-Won Hwang; Jin-Hee Kim; Jae-Hyon Bahk
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 2.  [S1 guidelines on airway management].

Authors:  T Piepho; E Cavus; R Noppens; C Byhahn; V Dörges; B Zwissler; A Timmermann
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  S1 guidelines on airway management : Guideline of the German Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine.

Authors:  T Piepho; E Cavus; R Noppens; C Byhahn; V Dörges; B Zwissler; A Timmermann
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  Recognition and management of the difficult airway with special emphasis on the intubating LMA-Fastrach/whistle technique: a brief review with case reports.

Authors:  James M Rich
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2005-07

5.  Effect of head elevation on passive upper airway collapsibility in normal subjects during propofol anesthesia.

Authors:  Masato Kobayashi; Takao Ayuse; Yuko Hoshino; Shinji Kurata; Shunji Moromugi; Hartmut Schneider; Jason P Kirkness; Alan R Schwartz; Kumiko Oi
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  Cross-over study of novice intubators performing endotracheal intubation in an upright versus supine position.

Authors:  Joseph S Turner; Timothy J Ellender; Enola R Okonkwo; Tyler M Stepsis; Andrew C Stevens; Christopher S Eddy; Erik G Sembroski; Anthony J Perkins; Dylan D Cooper
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 3.397

7.  A Remote-Controlled Airbag Device Can Improve Upper Airway Collapsibility by Producing Head Elevation With Jaw Closure in Normal Subjects Under Propofol Anesthesia.

Authors:  Satoru Ishizaka; Shunji Moromugi; Masato Kobayashi; Hiroki Kajihara; Kazuya Koga; Hirofumi Sugahara; Takakazu Ishimatsu; Shinji Kurata; Jason P Kirkness; Kumiko Oi; Takao Ayuse
Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med       Date:  2014-07-05       Impact factor: 3.316

8.  Anesthetic implications of obesity in the surgical patient.

Authors:  Jeremy Dority; Zaki-Udin Hassan; Destiny Chau
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2011-12

9.  An evaluation of the rapid airway management positioner in obese patients undergoing gastric bypass or laparoscopic gastric banding surgery.

Authors:  Davide Cattano; Vladimir Melnikov; Yameen Khalil; Srikanth Sridhar; Carin A Hagberg
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 4.129

10.  Comparative evaluation of the sniffing position with simple head extension for laryngoscopic view and intubation difficulty in adults undergoing elective surgery.

Authors:  Smita Prakash; Amy G Rapsang; Saurabh Mahajan; Shameek Bhattacharjee; Rajvir Singh; Anoop R Gogia
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2011-10-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.