Literature DB >> 12604972

Randomized double-blind study of the nutritional efficacy and bifidogenicity of a new infant formula containing partially hydrolyzed protein, a high beta-palmitic acid level, and nondigestible oligosaccharides.

Hansjörg Schmelzle1, Stefan Wirth, Heino Skopnik, Michael Radke, Jan Knol, Heinz-Michael Böckler, Anja Brönstrup, John Wells, Christoph Fusch.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the nutritional efficacy and bifidogenic characteristics of a new infant formula containing partially hydrolyzed whey protein, modified vegetable oil with a high beta-palmitic acid content, prebiotic oligosaccharides, and starch.
METHODS: In a double-blind study, healthy formula-fed term infants aged younger than 2 weeks were randomized to receive either the new infant formula (NF) or a standard formula (SF) until the age of 12 weeks. Anthropometric measurements were taken at enrollment, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks. In a subsample of infants, blood samples were taken at 6 weeks and stool samples were taken at enrollment and 6 weeks. Blood samples were analyzed for biochemical measures of protein status and amino acids, and stools were analyzed for total bacteria and bifidobacteria. Mothers completed a feeding diary and questionnaire at 6 and 10 weeks.
RESULTS: One hundred fifty-four infants were enrolled in the study; 102 completed the trial. The growth of infants in both formula groups was in line with published growth curves. During the first 6 weeks, NF girls gained more weight and head circumference than the SF girls. These velocity differences were not maintained throughout the 12-week study period. The NF stools had a higher proportion of bifidobacteria at 6 weeks compared with the SF stools, and they were softer. There were no clinically significant differences in the blood biochemical and amino acid values between groups. Both formulas were well tolerated by the infants.
CONCLUSIONS: When compared with a standard infant formula, the new formula supported satisfactory growth, led to higher counts of bifidobacteria in the feces, produced blood bio-chemical values typical of formula-fed infants, and was well tolerated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12604972     DOI: 10.1097/00005176-200303000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr        ISSN: 0277-2116            Impact factor:   2.839


  28 in total

1.  A mixture of prebiotic oligosaccharides reduces the incidence of atopic dermatitis during the first six months of age.

Authors:  G Moro; S Arslanoglu; B Stahl; J Jelinek; U Wahn; G Boehm
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2006-07-27       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Effects of animal protein supplementation of mothers, preterm infants, and term infants on growth outcomes in childhood: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  Laura Pimpin; Sarah Kranz; Enju Liu; Masha Shulkin; Dimitra Karageorgou; Victoria Miller; Wafaie Fawzi; Christopher Duggan; Patrick Webb; Dariush Mozaffarian
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 3.  Infant formulas containing hydrolysed protein for prevention of allergic disease and food allergy.

Authors:  David A Osborn; John Kh Sinn; Lisa J Jones
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-03-15

4.  Quantitative real-time PCR analysis of fecal Lactobacillus species in infants receiving a prebiotic infant formula.

Authors:  Monique Haarman; Jan Knol
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Quantitative real-time PCR assays to identify and quantify fecal Bifidobacterium species in infants receiving a prebiotic infant formula.

Authors:  Monique Haarman; Jan Knol
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 6.  A Scoping Review of Clinical Studies in Infants Fed Formulas Containing Palm Oil or Palm Olein and Sn-2 Palmitate.

Authors:  Mackenzie E Smith; Giulia Cisbani; R J Scott Lacombe; Richard P Bazinet
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 4.687

7.  A randomized placebo-controlled comparison of 2 prebiotic/probiotic combinations in preterm infants: impact on weight gain, intestinal microbiota, and fecal short-chain fatty acids.

Authors:  Mark A Underwood; Nita H Salzman; Stephen H Bennett; Melissa Barman; David A Mills; Angela Marcobal; Daniel J Tancredi; Charles L Bevins; Michael P Sherman
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.839

8.  Molecular ecological analysis of fecal bacterial populations from term infants fed formula supplemented with selected blends of prebiotics.

Authors:  Noriko Nakamura; H Rex Gaskins; Chad T Collier; Gerardo M Nava; Deshanie Rai; Bryon Petschow; W Michael Russell; Cheryl Harris; Roderick I Mackie; Jennifer L Wampler; D Carey Walker
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 9.  Prebiotics in infant formula.

Authors:  Yvan Vandenplas; Elisabeth De Greef; Gigi Veereman
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2014

Review 10.  Synbiotics, probiotics or prebiotics in infant formula for full term infants: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mary N Mugambi; Alfred Musekiwa; Martani Lombard; Taryn Young; Reneé Blaauw
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 3.271

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.