Literature DB >> 1260420

Dopaminergic substrates of intracranial self-stimulation in the caudate-putamen.

A G Phillips, D A Carter, H C Fibiger.   

Abstract

An extensive mapping of the caudate-putamen in rat for intracranial self-stimulation (ICS) site was undertaken to provide addtional support for the role of dopamine in brain-stimulation reward. Eight-seven per cent of the placements in the neostriatum supported ICS, with self-stimulation rates greater than 250/15 min at 56% of these sites. Electrical stimulation also elicited rearing and clonus, and contralateral body turn, both of which varied in magnitude between animals. In a second experiment, animals were prepared with electrodes aimed at the lateral caudateputamen. Those subjects displaying ICS subsequently received 6-hydroxydopamine lesions to the dopamine cell bodies in the substantia nigra pars compacta, either ipsilateral or contralateral to the electrode. The destruction of the dopamine cell bodies attenuated ICS in both groups during the first post-lesion test sessions. However, the rates in the ipsilateral group declined to between 2 and 9% of control scores, whereas the rate in the contralateral group improved over testing to 72% of control values, 28 days after the lesion. On the basis of these data, it was concluded that unilateral destruction of the dopaminergic nigro-neostriatal bundle (NSB) has two effects on ICS behavior. First, unilateral reduction of neostriatal dopamine is accompanied by a loss of brain-stimulation reward at sites normally innervated by the NSB, specifically the caudate-putamen. Secondly, lesions of the NSB produce a general disruption in bar-pressing behavior, as evidenced by the attenuation of ICS following contralateral lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1976        PMID: 1260420     DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(76)90615-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  16 in total

1.  Inhibition-mediating dopamine receptors and the control of intracranial reward.

Authors:  R J Katz
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1979-03-14       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 2.  Striatal mechanisms underlying movement, reinforcement, and punishment.

Authors:  Alexxai V Kravitz; Anatol C Kreitzer
Journal:  Physiology (Bethesda)       Date:  2012-06

3.  Differential effects of para-chlorophenylalanine on self-stimulation in caudate-putamen and lateral hypothalamus.

Authors:  A G Phillips; D A Carter; H C Fibiger
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1976-08-26       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 4.  Striatal dopamine in motor activation and reward-mediated learning: steps towards a unifying model.

Authors:  J Wickens
Journal:  J Neural Transm Gen Sect       Date:  1990

Review 5.  Basal ganglia circuit loops, dopamine and motivation: A review and enquiry.

Authors:  Satoshi Ikemoto; Chen Yang; Aaron Tan
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Preferential localization of self-stimulation sites in striosomes/patches in the rat striatum.

Authors:  N M White; N Hiroi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-05-26       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Blockade of intracranial self-stimulation by antipsychotic drugs: failure to correlate with central alpha-noradrenergic blockade.

Authors:  P Zarevics; E Weidley; P Setler
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1977-08-16       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Decreased intracranial self-stimulation after neuroleptics or 6-hydroxydopamine: evidence for mediation by motor deficits rather than by reduced reward.

Authors:  H C Fibiger; D A Carter; A G Phillips
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1976-05-05       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 9.  Associative and sensorimotor cortico-basal ganglia circuit roles in effects of abused drugs.

Authors:  C M Gremel; D M Lovinger
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 3.449

10.  A Neural Circuit for Gut-Induced Reward.

Authors:  Wenfei Han; Luis A Tellez; Matthew H Perkins; Isaac O Perez; Taoran Qu; Jozelia Ferreira; Tatiana L Ferreira; Daniele Quinn; Zhong-Wu Liu; Xiao-Bing Gao; Melanie M Kaelberer; Diego V Bohórquez; Sara J Shammah-Lagnado; Guillaume de Lartigue; Ivan E de Araujo
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 41.582

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.