Literature DB >> 12604115

Short-term variability of cerebral blood flow velocity responses to arterial blood pressure transients.

Ronney B Panerai1, Brian J Carey, John F Potter.   

Abstract

The time course of mean beat-to-beat changes in cerebral blood flow velocity changes induced by spontaneous transients in mean arterial blood pressure was studied in a group of 39 healthy subjects, ages 40 +/- 15 (SD) years. Continuous 10-min noninvasive recordings of cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV) from both middle cerebral arteries (MCA) with Doppler ultrasound (US) and simultaneous beat-to-beat arterial blood pressure (ABP) were made. A total of 522 spontaneous positive transients of ABP and CBFV were extracted with a maximum of 15 transients for each subject. The CBFV transient amplitude was normalized by the corresponding ABP change and the area-under-the-curve (AUC) of the falling phase was used to classify the CBFV regulatory response as either weak, moderate or strong. The coherent average of ABP and CBFV of each category confirmed the consistency of this classification, reinforced by the agreement of separate averages for recordings from the right and left MCA. All 39 subjects showed at least two categories of transients, with all three categories present in 33 subjects (right MCA) and 29 subjects (left MCA), respectively. These results indicate a significant short-term variability of CBFV responses in healthy subjects whose origin remains unexplained. Copyright 2003 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12604115     DOI: 10.1016/s0301-5629(02)00698-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  9 in total

Review 1.  Transcranial Doppler for evaluation of cerebral autoregulation.

Authors:  Ronney B Panerai
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 4.435

2.  Methodological comparison of active- and passive-driven oscillations in blood pressure; implications for the assessment of cerebral pressure-flow relationships.

Authors:  Jonathan D Smirl; Keegan Hoffman; Yu-Chieh Tzeng; Alex Hansen; Philip N Ainslie
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2015-07-16

3.  Continuous cerebral autoregulation monitoring by improved cross-correlation analysis: comparison with the cuff deflation test.

Authors:  Melanie Christ; Frank Noack; Tobias Schroeder; Andreas Hagmueller; Rainer Koch; Sven-Axel May; Ute Morgenstern; Maximilian Ragaller; Ralf Steinmeier
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-12-02       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  Correlation of clinical outcome with pressure-, oxygen-, and flow-related indices of cerebrovascular reactivity in patients following aneurysmal SAH.

Authors:  Martin Barth; Johannes Woitzik; Christel Weiss; Elke Muench; Michael Diepers; Peter Schmiedek; Hidetoshi Kasuya; Peter Vajkoczy
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.210

5.  Time-varying modeling of cerebral hemodynamics.

Authors:  Vasilis Z Marmarelis; Dae C Shin; Melissa Orme
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Continuous estimates of dynamic cerebral autoregulation during transient hypocapnia and hypercapnia.

Authors:  N E Dineen; F G Brodie; T G Robinson; R B Panerai
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2009-12-24

Review 7.  Regulation of cerebral blood flow in humans: physiology and clinical implications of autoregulation.

Authors:  Jurgen A H R Claassen; Dick H J Thijssen; Ronney B Panerai; Frank M Faraci
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 37.312

8.  A new model-free index of dynamic cerebral blood flow autoregulation.

Authors:  Max Chacón; José Luis Jara; Ronney B Panerai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  CrossTalk opposing view: dynamic cerebral autoregulation should be quantified using induced (rather than spontaneous) blood pressure fluctuations.

Authors:  David Simpson; Jurgen Claassen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 5.182

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.