Michael South1, Jenny Royle, Michael Starr. 1. Department of General Medicine, Royal Children's Hospital, Flemington Road, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia. mike.south@rch.org.au
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate changes in prescribing behaviour after distribution of antibiotic guidelines printed on a 9 x 6 cm laminated card suitable for clipping to a hospital identification badge. INTERVENTION: Guidelines for appropriate antibiotic prescribing for 20 common and important paediatric infections were printed on a laminated 9 x 6 cm card suitable to clip to a hospital identification badge and distributed to all medical staff. DESIGN: We collected data from medical records for three marker conditions (tonsillitis, pneumonia, and orbital/periorbital cellulitis) on samples of patients from the six-month periods either side of the month in which the cards were distributed. Prescribers were unaware of the study and investigators analysed the prescriptions without knowledge of the period in which they were written. Prescriptions were rated for appropriate choice of antibiotic and appropriate dose. Data were also collected on antibiotic costs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of cases in which antibiotic choice was appropriate; proportion of cases in which antibiotic dose was appropriate; annualised costs of third-generation cephalosporins. RESULTS: For tonsillitis there was little change in prescribing practice after the cards were introduced. For pneumonia, cases with appropriate choice increased from 77% to 92% (P = 0.028) and cases with appropriate dose increased from 48% to 81% (P = 0.001). For orbital/periorbital cellulitis, cases with appropriate choice increased from 19% to 78% (P < 0.001) and cases with appropriate dose increased from 30% to 51% (P = 0.11). Annualised costs of third-generation cephalosporins were $193 245 pre-cards and $89 814 post-cards. CONCLUSION: The cards appeared to have a beneficial effect on prescribing practice for the three marker conditions. This simple intervention is likely to be cost-effective and useful in reducing inappropriate use of antibiotics.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate changes in prescribing behaviour after distribution of antibiotic guidelines printed on a 9 x 6 cm laminated card suitable for clipping to a hospital identification badge. INTERVENTION: Guidelines for appropriate antibiotic prescribing for 20 common and important paediatric infections were printed on a laminated 9 x 6 cm card suitable to clip to a hospital identification badge and distributed to all medical staff. DESIGN: We collected data from medical records for three marker conditions (tonsillitis, pneumonia, and orbital/periorbital cellulitis) on samples of patients from the six-month periods either side of the month in which the cards were distributed. Prescribers were unaware of the study and investigators analysed the prescriptions without knowledge of the period in which they were written. Prescriptions were rated for appropriate choice of antibiotic and appropriate dose. Data were also collected on antibiotic costs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of cases in which antibiotic choice was appropriate; proportion of cases in which antibiotic dose was appropriate; annualised costs of third-generation cephalosporins. RESULTS: For tonsillitis there was little change in prescribing practice after the cards were introduced. For pneumonia, cases with appropriate choice increased from 77% to 92% (P = 0.028) and cases with appropriate dose increased from 48% to 81% (P = 0.001). For orbital/periorbital cellulitis, cases with appropriate choice increased from 19% to 78% (P < 0.001) and cases with appropriate dose increased from 30% to 51% (P = 0.11). Annualised costs of third-generation cephalosporins were $193 245 pre-cards and $89 814 post-cards. CONCLUSION: The cards appeared to have a beneficial effect on prescribing practice for the three marker conditions. This simple intervention is likely to be cost-effective and useful in reducing inappropriate use of antibiotics.
Authors: Sara Rossin; Elisa Barbieri; Anna Cantarutti; Francesco Martinolli; Carlo Giaquinto; Liviana Da Dalt; Daniele Doná Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-10-27 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Kirsty L Buising; Karin A Thursky; James F Black; Lachlan MacGregor; Alan C Street; Marcus P Kennedy; Graham V Brown Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2008-07-31 Impact factor: 2.796
Authors: Daniele Donà; Silvia Zingarella; Andrea Gastaldi; Rebecca Lundin; Giorgio Perilongo; Anna Chiara Frigo; Rana F Hamdy; Theoklis Zaoutis; Liviana Da Dalt; Carlo Giaquinto Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-02-28 Impact factor: 3.240