Literature DB >> 12602902

Polymorphisms in steroid hormone pathway genes and mammographic density.

Christopher A Haiman1, Susan E Hankinson, Immaculata De Vivo, Chantal Guillemette, Naoko Ishibe, David J Hunter, Celia Byrne.   

Abstract

Mammographic density has been linked with exposure to endogenous and exogenous steroid hormones, and increased breast cancer risk. Variation in breast density may be due, in part, to polymorphisms in steroid hormone biosynthesis, metabolism and signaling genes. We conducted cross-sectional analyses within the Nurses' Health Study (n = 538), to investigate variation in mammographic breast density, by 10 polymorphisms in eight candidate genes (CYP17, CYP19, CYP1A1, CYP1B1, COMT, UGT1A1, AR, and AIB1). Breast density was assessed using a computer-assisted technique. We evaluated whether associations between variant alleles of these genes and breast density differed by menopause and postmenopausal hormone (PMH) use. Polymorphisms in CYP17, CYP19, CYP1B1, COMT CYP1A1, or AR were not associated consistently with breast density among premenopausal or postmenopausal women. Premenopausal women with the 7/7 UGT1A1 genotype had lower breast density (difference compared to the 6/6 genotype of: -16.5% density; p = 0.04). In contrast, postmenopausal women with the 7/7 UGT1A1 genotype had greater breast density compared to those with the 6/6 genotype (+6.2% density; p = 0.05); this association was strongest among current PMH users (+13.0% density; p = 0.03). In analyses limited to postmenopausal women, breast density was also greater among women carrying short AIB1 alleles (< or = 26 glutamine repeats; +4.1% density; p = 0.04). Most of the variants in the candidate breast cancer genes evaluated in this study are not strong predictors of breast density. However, our findings of differences in associations for UGT1A1 and AIB1 genotypes with breast density by menopausal status needs additional corroboration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12602902     DOI: 10.1023/a:1021112121782

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  26 in total

1.  Pilot study demonstrating potential association between breast cancer image-based risk phenotypes and genomic biomarkers.

Authors:  Hui Li; Maryellen L Giger; Chang Sun; Umnouy Ponsukcharoen; Dezheng Huo; Li Lan; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Andrew R Jamieson; Jeremy Bancroft Brown; Anna Di Rienzo
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Associations between polymorphisms in glucuronidation and sulfation enzymes and mammographic breast density in premenopausal women in the United States.

Authors:  Mellissa Yong; Stephen M Schwartz; Charlotte Atkinson; Karen W Makar; Sushma S Thomas; Katherine M Newton; Erin J Aiello Bowles; Victoria L Holt; Wendy M Leisenring; Johanna W Lampe
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Altered AIB1 or AIB1Δ3 expression impacts ERα effects on mammary gland stromal and epithelial content.

Authors:  Rebecca E Nakles; Maddalena Tilli Shiffert; Edgar S Díaz-Cruz; M Carla Cabrera; Maram Alotaiby; Anne M Miermont; Anna T Riegel; Priscilla A Furth
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2011-02-03

4.  Genotypes and haplotypes in the insulin-like growth factors, their receptors and binding proteins in relation to plasma metabolic levels and mammographic density.

Authors:  Margarethe Biong; Inger T Gram; Ilene Brill; Fredrik Johansen; Hiroko K Solvang; Grethe I G Alnaes; Toril Fagerheim; Yngve Bremnes; Stephen J Chanock; Laurie Burdett; Meredith Yeager; Giske Ursin; Vessela N Kristensen
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 3.063

5.  Genetic variation in the estrogen metabolic pathway and mammographic density as an intermediate phenotype of breast cancer.

Authors:  Jingmei Li; Louise Eriksson; Keith Humphreys; Kamila Czene; Jianjun Liu; Rulla M Tamimi; Sara Lindström; David J Hunter; Celine M Vachon; Fergus J Couch; Christopher G Scott; Pagona Lagiou; Per Hall
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 6.466

6.  Haplotype analyses of CYP19A1 gene variants and breast cancer risk: results from the Shanghai Breast Cancer Study.

Authors:  Qiuyin Cai; Nobuhiko Kataoka; Chun Li; Wanqing Wen; Jeffrey R Smith; Yu-Tang Gao; Xiao Ou Shu; Wei Zheng
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Genetic polymorphisms in uridine diphospho-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 and breast cancer risk in Africans.

Authors:  Dezheng Huo; Hee-Jin Kim; Clement A Adebamowo; Temidayo O Ogundiran; Effiong E Akang; Oladapo Campbell; Adeniyi Adenipekun; Qun Niu; Lise Sveen; James D Fackenthal; Donna Lee Fackenthal; Soma Das; Nancy Cox; Anna Di Rienzo; Olufunmilayo I Olopade
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 8.  Can genes for mammographic density inform cancer aetiology?

Authors:  Linda E Kelemen; Thomas A Sellers; Celine M Vachon
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2008-09-05       Impact factor: 60.716

9.  Sex steroid metabolism polymorphisms and mammographic density in pre- and early perimenopausal women.

Authors:  Carolyn J Crandall; Mary E Sehl; Sybil L Crawford; Ellen B Gold; Laurel A Habel; Lesley M Butler; Maryfran R Sowers; Gail A Greendale; Janet S Sinsheimer
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Androgen receptor polyglutamine repeat number: models of selection and disease susceptibility.

Authors:  Calen P Ryan; Bernard J Crespi
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 5.183

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.