Literature DB >> 12602642

An evaluation of the dose-response relationship in naturalistic treatment settings using survival analysis.

Nathan B Hansen1, Michael J Lambert.   

Abstract

To date, few studies have been published on the dose-response relationship in psychotherapy. The current study addresses limitations of previous research by using (1) clinical significance methodology to address the meaningfulness of patient change, (2) survival analysis to assess change across time, (3) assessment of patient change on a session-by-session basis, and (4) a large data set representing a variety of treatment settings. A total of 4,761 patients representing standard treatment settings in the United States were tracked at each session of therapy. A survival analysis of this data reveals that between 15 and 19 sessions of therapy are required for a 50% recovery rate using clinical significance methodology. The results of this study provide a useful overview of time-to-change in naturalistic settings that can be used to estimate reliable treatment expectations and as a baseline for comparison when modifications are made within treatment delivery systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12602642     DOI: 10.1023/a:1021751307358

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ment Health Serv Res        ISSN: 1522-3434


  12 in total

1.  Measuring youths' perceptions of counseling impact: description, psychometric evaluation, and longitudinal examination of the Youth Counseling Impact Scale v.2.

Authors:  Marcia A Kearns; M Michele Athay; Manuel Riemer
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2012-03

2.  Effectiveness of Briefer Coping-Focused Psychotherapy for Common Mental Complaints on Work-Participation and Mental Health: A Pragmatic Randomized Trial with 2-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  M E A Wormgoor; A Indahl; E Andersen; J Egeland
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2020-03

3.  The effectiveness of child and adolescent psychiatric treatments in a naturalistic outpatient setting.

Authors:  Mareile Bachmann; Christian J Bachmann; Katja John; Monika Heinzel-Gutenbrunner; Helmut Remschmidt; Fritz Mattejat
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 49.548

4.  Evidence-based psychological treatments for mental disorders: modifiable barriers to access and possible solutions.

Authors:  Allison G Harvey; Nicole B Gumport
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2015-02-26

5.  Psychotherapy in the Veterans Health Administration: Missed Opportunities?

Authors:  Jeffrey A Cully; Laura Tolpin; Louise Henderson; Daniel Jimenez; Mark E Kunik; Laura A Petersen
Journal:  Psychol Serv       Date:  2008-11

6.  Who gets the most out of cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety disorders? The role of treatment dose and patient engagement.

Authors:  Daniel Glenn; Daniela Golinelli; Raphael D Rose; Peter Roy-Byrne; Murray B Stein; Greer Sullivan; Alexander Bystritksy; Cathy Sherbourne; Michelle G Craske
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2013-06-10

7.  Supportive accountability: a model for providing human support to enhance adherence to eHealth interventions.

Authors:  David C Mohr; Pim Cuijpers; Kenneth Lehman
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  Health psychology in primary care: recent research and future directions.

Authors:  Stephen Thielke; Alexander Thompson; Richard Stuart
Journal:  Psychol Res Behav Manag       Date:  2011-06-01

9.  Patient-Centered Pain Care Using Artificial Intelligence and Mobile Health Tools: Protocol for a Randomized Study Funded by the US Department of Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development Program.

Authors:  John D Piette; Sarah L Krein; Dana Striplin; Nicolle Marinec; Robert D Kerns; Karen B Farris; Satinder Singh; Lawrence An; Alicia A Heapy
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2016-04-07

10.  The Treatment of Internet Gaming Disorder: a Brief Overview of the PIPATIC Program.

Authors:  Alexandra Torres-Rodríguez; Mark D Griffiths; Xavier Carbonell
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Addict       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 3.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.