Literature DB >> 12602466

Inflammatory response of a new synthetic dialyzer membrane. A randomised cross-over comparison between polysulfone and helixone.

S Stefoni1, L Colì, G Cianciolo, G Donati, G Ruggeri, E Ramazzotti, R Pohlmeier, D Lang.   

Abstract

Hemodialysis patients suffer from chronic inflammation due to intradialytic contact of blood with artificial materials. The FX 60 dialyzer which belongs to the new FX-class series of dialyzers is composed of the new membrane Helixone. This membrane is derived from the original Fresenius Polysulfone membrane. The FX-class design is based on modified geometry of fibres and housing and has resulted in a new dialyzer with improved efficiency, safety and ease of handling compared to the F series (F 60S) dialyzer. The aim of the study was to investigate whether the biocompatibility pattern in terms of inflammatory parameters of the new type of polysulfone dialyzer has changed compared to the standard. A clinical in vivo study was conducted to compare the intradialytic inflammatory response of the two dialyzers, FX 60 and F 60S. Eight chronic dialysis patients were selected for the study: mean age 65.5 +/- 15.5 years, mean time on dialysis 100 +/- 95 months. The randomized cross-over study involved a treatment period of 2 weeks (total 6 sessions), one week with each dialyzer, starting with one or the other according to the randomization scheme. Blood samples were taken at 0 (T0), 15, 60, and 240 minutes to evaluate white blood cell (WBC) count, complement factor C5a, leukocyte elastase, soluble intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (sICAM-1), platelet count, C-reactive protein (CRP). At 15 min, WBC count showed a comparably, low decrease for both dialyzers: -7.6% for FX 60 versus -6.6% for F 60S, p=not significant (ns). At the same time the C5a concentration decreased from 15.0 +/- 7.5 ng/ml to 13.5 +/- 6.7 ng/ml (p=ns) for FX 60, and from 15.1 +/- 12.5 ng/ml to 14.9 +/- 25.0 ng/ml for F 60S (p=ns). The elastase concentration progressively increased over time with no statistical difference between the two dialyzers. The levels of sICAM-1, CRP, and platelet count were similar at each time point for both dialyzers, varying around the baseline values (p=ns). No significant difference emerged in terms of inflammatory response between the two dialyzers, hemo demonstrating that the biocompatibility of the F-series was maintained in the FX-class series of dialyzers and is independent of design factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12602466     DOI: 10.1177/039139880302600105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Artif Organs        ISSN: 0391-3988            Impact factor:   1.595


  3 in total

1.  Effect of membrane permeability on inflammation and arterial stiffness: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Philip Kam-Tao Li; Yuk Lun Cheng; Chi Bon Leung; Cheuk Chun Szeto; Kai Ming Chow; Bonnie Ching-Ha Kwan; Esther Siu-Chun Ng; Queenie Wing-Yi Fok; Yuet Ling Poon; Alex Wai-Yin Yu
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  Performance and Hemocompatibility of a Novel Polysulfone Dialyzer: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Götz Ehlerding; Ansgar Erlenkötter; Adelheid Gauly; Bettina Griesshaber; James Kennedy; Lena Rauber; Wolfgang Ries; Hans Schmidt-Gürtler; Manuela Stauss-Grabo; Stephan Wagner; Adam M Zawada; Sebastian Zschätzsch; Manuela Kempkes-Koch
Journal:  Kidney360       Date:  2021-04-07

3.  Removal of free light chains in hemodialysis patients without multiple myeloma: a crossover comparison of three different dialyzers.

Authors:  Gabriele Donati; Maria Ilaria Moretti; Olga Baraldi; Alessandra Spazzoli; Irene Capelli; Giorgia Comai; Antonio Marchetti; Maria Sarma; Rita Mancini; Gaetano La Manna
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 2.388

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.