Literature DB >> 12602082

The typical Cochrane review. How many trials? How many participants?

Susan Mallett, Mike Clarke.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe the number of trials and participants in a typical systematic review from The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
METHODS: The number of trials in 1,000 Cochrane systematic reviews in issue 1, 2001 of The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews was counted for three categories of trial: included trials, ongoing trials, and trials awaiting assessment for inclusion. (The term trial is used in this paper, although a small number of Cochrane reviews include studies that are not trials.) The total number of participants in included trials was extracted from a sample of reviews.
RESULTS: A total of 9,778 trials were included in the Cochrane reviews. There were a further 356 ongoing trials and 1,138 trials awaiting assessment for inclusion. A typical review contained six included trials. Forty percent of the reviews listed ongoing trials and/or trials awaiting assessment for inclusion. Based on a sample of 258 reviews, the median number of participants per review was 945 (interquartile range, 313 to 2,511) per review and 118 (interquartile range, 60 to 241) per trial.
CONCLUSION: This report is a descriptive study of the number of trials and participants in a typical Cochrane review from The Cochrane Library, issue 1, 2001.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12602082     DOI: 10.1017/s0266462302000624

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care        ISSN: 0266-4623            Impact factor:   2.188


  13 in total

1.  Can we rely on the best trial? A comparison of individual trials and systematic reviews.

Authors:  Paul P Glasziou; Sasha Shepperd; Jon Brassey
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 4.615

2.  Pain management during the withholding and withdrawal of life support in critically ill patients at the end of life: a response to a comment.

Authors:  Andres Laserna; John A Cuenca; Cosmo Fowler; Alejandro Duran-Crane
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  Drugs for nocturnal enuresis in children (other than desmopressin and tricyclics).

Authors:  Aniruddh V Deshpande; Patrina H Y Caldwell; Premala Sureshkumar
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-12-12

4.  Seventy-five trials and eleven systematic reviews a day: how will we ever keep up?

Authors:  Hilda Bastian; Paul Glasziou; Iain Chalmers
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 11.069

Review 5.  Grey literature in meta-analyses of randomized trials of health care interventions.

Authors:  S Hopewell; S McDonald; M Clarke; M Egger
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-04-18

6.  An alternative to the hand searching gold standard: validating methodological search filters using relative recall.

Authors:  Margaret Sampson; Li Zhang; Andra Morrison; Nicholas J Barrowman; Tammy J Clifford; Robert W Platt; Terry P Klassen; David Moher
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2006-07-18       Impact factor: 4.615

7.  Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews.

Authors:  David Moher; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Andrea C Tricco; Margaret Sampson; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2007-03-27       Impact factor: 11.069

8.  Single screen of citations with excluded terms: an approach to citation screening in systematic reviews.

Authors:  Brittany U Carter
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2018-07-28

9.  The use of older studies in meta-analyses of medical interventions: a survey.

Authors:  Nikolaos A Patsopoulos; John Pa Ioannidis
Journal:  Open Med       Date:  2009-05-26

10.  Examining publication bias-a simulation-based evaluation of statistical tests on publication bias.

Authors:  Andreas Schneck
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.