Literature DB >> 12601834

Does transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length before 14 weeks predict preterm delivery in high-risk pregnancies?

V Berghella1, M Talucci, A Desai.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether high-risk patients manifest cervical length < 25 mm on transvaginal ultrasound before 14 weeks of gestation, and if this finding is predictive of preterm delivery.
METHODS: Asymptomatic pregnancies at high risk for preterm birth were followed prospectively from 10 + 0 weeks to 13 + 6 weeks with transvaginal sonographic measurement of the cervix. A cervical length < 25 mm was considered a short cervix at this gestational age and at the follow-up ultrasound examinations, performed between 14 and 24 weeks. The primary outcome was preterm birth at < 35 weeks of gestation.
RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-three pregnancies met the study criteria and were included in the analysis. Only 10 (5%) patients had a cervix < 25 mm before 14 weeks. The sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values of a short cervix were 14%, 97%, 50%, and 82%, respectively (relative risk, 2.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-5.6). The mean transvaginal sonographic cervical length before 14 weeks of gestation was 33.7 +/- 6.9 mm in pregnancies which delivered preterm (n = 36), and 35.0 +/- 6.8 mm in those delivering at term (n = 147) (P = 0.3). Follow-up transvaginal ultrasound examination of the cervix to 24 weeks revealed that the average gestational age at which a short cervix was detected was 18.7 +/- 2.9 weeks.
CONCLUSION: A cervical length < 25 mm on transvaginal sonographic assessment rarely occurs before 14 weeks even in high-risk patients destined to deliver preterm; in these patients cervical changes predictive of preterm birth develop mostly after this gestational age. Copyright 2003 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12601834     DOI: 10.1002/uog.28

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  6 in total

1.  Prevention and Therapy of Preterm Birth. Guideline of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG (S2k Level, AWMF Registry Number 015/025, February 2019) - Part 1 with Recommendations on the Epidemiology, Etiology, Prediction, Primary and Secondary Prevention of Preterm Birth.

Authors:  Richard Berger; Harald Abele; Franz Bahlmann; Ivonne Bedei; Klaus Doubek; Ursula Felderhoff-Müser; Herbert Fluhr; Yves Garnier; Susanne Grylka-Baeschlin; Hanns Helmer; Egbert Herting; Markus Hoopmann; Irene Hösli; Udo Hoyme; Alexandra Jendreizeck; Harald Krentel; Ruben Kuon; Wolf Lütje; Silke Mader; Holger Maul; Werner Mendling; Barbara Mitschdörfer; Tatjana Nicin; Monika Nothacker; Dirk Olbertz; Werner Rath; Claudia Roll; Dietmar Schlembach; Ekkehard Schleußner; Florian Schütz; Vanadin Seifert-Klauss; Susanne Steppat; Daniel Surbek
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 2.915

2.  Pregnancy outcome after cervical conization: risk factors for preterm delivery and the efficacy of prophylactic cerclage.

Authors:  Ka Hyun Nam; Ja Young Kwon; Young-Han Kim; Yong-Won Park
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 4.401

3.  Associations of temporal changes in cervical length and lower uterine segment length with spontaneous preterm delivery risk: a prospective study of 727 Japanese women.

Authors:  Rie Oi; Naoyuki Miyasaka; Takahiro Yamashita; Tomoko Adachi
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 1.314

Review 4.  Predictive accuracy of changes in transvaginal sonographic cervical length over time for preterm birth: a systematic review and metaanalysis.

Authors:  Agustin Conde-Agudelo; Roberto Romero
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Do serial measurements of cervical length improve the prediction of preterm birth in asymptomatic women with twin gestations?

Authors:  Nir Melamed; Alex Pittini; Liran Hiersch; Yariv Yogev; Steven J Korzeniewski; Roberto Romero; Jon Barrett
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 6.  Cervical Assessment for Predicting Preterm Birth-Cervical Length and Beyond.

Authors:  Lee Reicher; Yuval Fouks; Yariv Yogev
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-02-07       Impact factor: 4.241

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.