RATIONALE: Strain differences in mice have been reported in response to drugs in the mouse forced swimming test (FST), even if few antidepressants were examined. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of genetic factors, using five antidepressants (imipramine, desipramine, citalopram, paroxetine and bupropion) in the mouse FST, in outbred strains (Swiss, NMRI) and inbred strains (DBA/2, C57BL/6J Rj). Moreover, whole brain levels of dopamine (DA), noradrenaline (NA), serotonin (5-HT) in vehicle treated animals, which were or were not subjected to the FST, were measured by HPLC analysis in an attempt to explain behavioural differences. METHODS: For each antidepressant, a dose range (1-16 mg/kg) was tested in the locomotor apparatus and only non-psychostimulant doses were then tested in the FST in order to detect antidepressant-like activity. RESULTS: No baseline differences among Swiss, NMRI, DBA/2 and C57BL/6J Rj strains were observed in our experiments, allowing the comparison of different antidepressants in each strain. Imipramine (16 mg/kg), desipramine, citalopram (4-16 mg/kg) and paroxetine (8 and 16 mg/kg) treatment decreased the immobility time in the Swiss strain and the size of the effect reached more than 20% for each of these antidepressants. C57BL/6J Rj was the only strain sensitive to bupropion (2 and 4 mg/kg). In the NMRI strain, only paroxetine treatment decreased the immobility time (16 mg/kg). CONCLUSION: Our study showed that drug sensitivity is genotype dependent. FST results have shown that Swiss mice are the most sensitive strain to detect 5-HT and/or NA treatment. The use of DBA/2 inbred mice may be limited, as an absence of antidepressant-like response was observed in the FST. The lack of sensitivity to antidepressant treatment in DBA/2 strains could be due to high DA, NA and 5-HT whole brain concentrations.
RATIONALE: Strain differences in mice have been reported in response to drugs in the mouse forced swimming test (FST), even if few antidepressants were examined. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of genetic factors, using five antidepressants (imipramine, desipramine, citalopram, paroxetine and bupropion) in the mouse FST, in outbred strains (Swiss, NMRI) and inbred strains (DBA/2, C57BL/6J Rj). Moreover, whole brain levels of dopamine (DA), noradrenaline (NA), serotonin (5-HT) in vehicle treated animals, which were or were not subjected to the FST, were measured by HPLC analysis in an attempt to explain behavioural differences. METHODS: For each antidepressant, a dose range (1-16 mg/kg) was tested in the locomotor apparatus and only non-psychostimulant doses were then tested in the FST in order to detect antidepressant-like activity. RESULTS: No baseline differences among Swiss, NMRI, DBA/2 and C57BL/6J Rj strains were observed in our experiments, allowing the comparison of different antidepressants in each strain. Imipramine (16 mg/kg), desipramine, citalopram (4-16 mg/kg) and paroxetine (8 and 16 mg/kg) treatment decreased the immobility time in the Swiss strain and the size of the effect reached more than 20% for each of these antidepressants. C57BL/6J Rj was the only strain sensitive to bupropion (2 and 4 mg/kg). In the NMRI strain, only paroxetine treatment decreased the immobility time (16 mg/kg). CONCLUSION: Our study showed that drug sensitivity is genotype dependent. FST results have shown that Swiss mice are the most sensitive strain to detect 5-HT and/or NA treatment. The use of DBA/2 inbred mice may be limited, as an absence of antidepressant-like response was observed in the FST. The lack of sensitivity to antidepressant treatment in DBA/2 strains could be due to high DA, NA and 5-HT whole brain concentrations.
Authors: J N Crawley; J K Belknap; A Collins; J C Crabbe; W Frankel; N Henderson; R J Hitzemann; S C Maxson; L L Miner; A J Silva; J M Wehner; A Wynshaw-Boris; R Paylor Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 1997-07 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Adem Can; David T Dao; Michal Arad; Chantelle E Terrillion; Sean C Piantadosi; Todd D Gould Journal: J Vis Exp Date: 2012-01-29 Impact factor: 1.355
Authors: Adem Can; David T Dao; Chantelle E Terrillion; Sean C Piantadosi; Shambhu Bhat; Todd D Gould Journal: J Vis Exp Date: 2012-01-28 Impact factor: 1.355
Authors: Jacob P R Jacobsen; Per Plenge; Benjamin D Sachs; Alan L Pehrson; Manuel Cajina; Yunzhi Du; Wendy Roberts; Meghan L Rudder; Prachiti Dalvi; Taylor J Robinson; Sharon P O'Neill; King S Khoo; Connie Sanchez Morillo; Xiaodong Zhang; Marc G Caron Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2014-05-09 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Sarah Adams Schoenrock; Daniel Oreper; Nancy Young; Robin Betsch Ervin; Molly A Bogue; William Valdar; Lisa M Tarantino Journal: Physiol Behav Date: 2016-09-29