Literature DB >> 12601268

Return to work after lower limb amputation.

K Fisher1, R S Hanspal, L Marks.   

Abstract

This study investigated the proportion of patients who returned to work following amputation and the factors that influenced a positive or negative outcome. One hundred patients of working age who had sustained unilateral lower limb amputation at least 1 year previously and who were established prosthesis users participated in the study. A specially designed questionnaire similar to a guided interview was administered by the rehabilitation physician at the patients' routine follow-ups. The questionnaire yielded a unique score dependent on whether return to work (or a different or preferred occupation) had been achieved with good or reduced productivity. All patients were eligible for mobility benefit, including schemes to purchase suitably adapted vehicles if necessary. However, no vocational rehabilitation was available. Sixty-six per cent of patients returned to employment and this was related to mobility, time since amputation and Handicap Scale scores. Age, socket comfort, level and cause of amputation, type of previous work or the presence of other medical problems did not differ between those who did and did not return to work. The Employment Questionnaire showed good correspondence with the London Handicap Scale, indicating some concurrent validity, although future development might include consideration of psychological factors, which could explain more of the reasons for continued unemployment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12601268     DOI: 10.1097/00004356-200303000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Rehabil Res        ISSN: 0342-5282            Impact factor:   1.479


  8 in total

1.  The effect of a job placement and support program for workers with musculoskeletal injuries: a randomized control trial (RCT) study.

Authors:  C W P Li-Tsang; E J Q Li; C S Lam; K Y L Hui; C C H Chan
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2008-06-18

2.  Impact of Time to Receipt of Prosthesis on Total Healthcare Costs 12 Months Post-amputation.

Authors:  Taavy Miller; Rajib Paul; Melinda Forthofer; Shane R Wurdeman
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 2.159

Review 3.  Factors Influencing Functional Outcomes and Return-to-Work After Amputation: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Benjamin J Darter; Carolyn E Hawley; Amy J Armstrong; Lauren Avellone; Paul Wehman
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2018-12

4.  Cost effectiveness of adding dapagliflozin to insulin for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Heleen G M van Haalen; Marjolein Pompen; Klas Bergenheim; Phil McEwan; Rebecca Townsend; Marina Roudaut
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.859

5.  Health-related quality of life and the ability to perform activities of daily living: a cross-sectional study on 1079 war veterans with ankle-foot disorders.

Authors:  Mostafa Allami; Amir Yavari; Amir Karimi; Mehdi Masoumi; Mohammadreza Soroush; Elahe Faraji
Journal:  Mil Med Res       Date:  2017-11-29

6.  Cell Phone Application to Monitor Pain and Quality of Life in Neurogenic Pain Patients.

Authors:  Rachita Sood; Jenna R Stoehr; Lindsay E Janes; Jason H Ko; Gregory A Dumanian; Sumanas W Jordan
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-04-29

Review 7.  Outcomes of dysvascular partial foot amputation and how these compare to transtibial amputation: a systematic review for the development of shared decision-making resources.

Authors:  Michael P Dillon; Matthew Quigley; Stefania Fatone
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2017-03-14

8.  Impact of Time to Receipt of Prosthesis on Total Healthcare Costs 12 Months Postamputation.

Authors:  Taavy A Miller; Rajib Paul; Melinda Forthofer; Shane R Wurdeman
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 3.412

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.