BACKGROUND: Chronic pain disorder is assumed to represent a frequent and disabling condition. However, data on the prevalence of somatoform pain symptoms and somatoform pain disorder in the community are limited to date. METHODS: German versions of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview were administered to a representative national sample of 4,075 people. Somatoform pain disorder was diagnosed by standardized diagnostic algorithm based on the DSM-III-R criteria (absence of adequate physical findings). One subgroup was identified as also meeting the DSM-IV criterion B for 'significant distress or psychosocial impairment due to the somatoform pain'. RESULTS: A lifetime prevalence rate of somatoform pain disorder according to DSM-III-R of 33.7% and a 6-month rate of 17.3% was found. When applying the DSM-IV B criterion, the prevalence rate dropped to 12.3 and 5.4%, respectively. In both groups more than 95% of the probands had contacted their doctor because of the pain. In 25% of the probands the pain was positively assigned to psychological factors. A female:male ratio of 2:1 was found. CONCLUSIONS: Somatoform pain disorder (DSM-III-R) is a frequent condition. However, only about one third of these subjects is severely distressed or impaired by the pain. A clear operationalized concept of the DSM-IV criterion C 'psychological factors are judged to have an important role in the onset, severity, exacerbation or maintenance of the pain' should be provided in the further development of the diagnosis 'pain disorder' in order to make this diagnosis suitable for general population surveys. Copyright 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel
BACKGROUND:Chronic pain disorder is assumed to represent a frequent and disabling condition. However, data on the prevalence of somatoform pain symptoms and somatoform pain disorder in the community are limited to date. METHODS: German versions of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview were administered to a representative national sample of 4,075 people. Somatoform pain disorder was diagnosed by standardized diagnostic algorithm based on the DSM-III-R criteria (absence of adequate physical findings). One subgroup was identified as also meeting the DSM-IV criterion B for 'significant distress or psychosocial impairment due to the somatoform pain'. RESULTS: A lifetime prevalence rate of somatoform pain disorder according to DSM-III-R of 33.7% and a 6-month rate of 17.3% was found. When applying the DSM-IV B criterion, the prevalence rate dropped to 12.3 and 5.4%, respectively. In both groups more than 95% of the probands had contacted their doctor because of the pain. In 25% of the probands the pain was positively assigned to psychological factors. A female:male ratio of 2:1 was found. CONCLUSIONS:Somatoform pain disorder (DSM-III-R) is a frequent condition. However, only about one third of these subjects is severely distressed or impaired by the pain. A clear operationalized concept of the DSM-IV criterion C 'psychological factors are judged to have an important role in the onset, severity, exacerbation or maintenance of the pain' should be provided in the further development of the diagnosis 'pain disorder' in order to make this diagnosis suitable for general population surveys. Copyright 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel
Authors: M Noll-Hussong; H Glaesmer; S Herberger; K Bernardy; C Schönfeldt-Lecuona; A Lukas; H Guendel; T Nikolaus Journal: Z Gerontol Geriatr Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 1.281
Authors: Katja Beesdo; Frank Jacobi; Jürgen Hoyer; Nancy C P Low; Michael Höfler; Hans-Ulrich Wittchen Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2009-04-10 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: Margot W M de Waal; Ingrid A Arnold; Just A H Eekhof; Willem J J Assendelft; Albert M van Hemert Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2008-01-24 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Alexander Obbarius; Felix Fischer; Gregor Liegl; Nina Obbarius; Jan van Bebber; Tobias Hofmann; Matthias Rose Journal: J Pain Res Date: 2020-05-14 Impact factor: 3.133