Literature DB >> 12600368

Subjective social status: its determinants and its association with measures of ill-health in the Whitehall II study.

Archana Singh-Manoux1, Nancy E Adler, Michael G Marmot.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was twofold-(1) investigate the role of subjective social status as a predictor of ill-health, with a further exploration of the extent to which this relationship could be accounted for by conventional measures of socioeconomic position; (2) examine the determinants of a relatively new measure of subjective social status used in this study. A 10 rung self-anchoring scale was used to measure subjective social status in the Whitehall II study, a prospective cohort study of London-based civil service employees. Results indicate that subjective status is a strong predictor of ill-health, and that education, occupation and income do not explain this relationship fully for all the health measures examined. The results provide further support for the multidimensional nature of both social inequality and health. Multiple regression shows subjective status to be determined by occupational position, education, household income, satisfaction with standard of living, and feeling of financial security regarding the future. The results suggest that subjective social status reflects the cognitive averaging of standard markers of socioeconomic situation and is free of psychological biases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12600368     DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00131-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  252 in total

1.  Study methods, recruitment, sociodemographic findings, and demographic representativeness in the OPPERA study.

Authors:  Gary D Slade; Eric Bair; Kunthel By; Flora Mulkey; Cristina Baraian; Rebecca Rothwell; Maria Reynolds; Vanessa Miller; Yoly Gonzalez; Sharon Gordon; Margarete Ribeiro-Dasilva; Pei Feng Lim; Joel D Greenspan; Ron Dubner; Roger B Fillingim; Luda Diatchenko; William Maixner; Dawn Dampier; Charles Knott; Richard Ohrbach
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 5.820

2.  Critical biological pathways for chronic psychosocial stress and research opportunities to advance the consideration of stress in chemical risk assessment.

Authors:  Bruce S McEwen; Pamela Tucker
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Anxious? Depressed? You might be suffering from capitalism: contradictory class locations and the prevalence of depression and anxiety in the USA.

Authors:  Seth J Prins; Lisa M Bates; Katherine M Keyes; Carles Muntaner
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2015-08-03

4.  Developmental Trajectories of Subjective Social Status.

Authors:  Elizabeth Goodman; Sarah Maxwell; Susan Malspeis; Nancy Adler
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Socioeconomic Status and Cardiovascular Risk Control in Adults With Diabetes.

Authors:  Tejas Doshi; Brittany L Smalls; Joni S Williams; Tamara E Wolfman; Leonard E Egede
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 2.378

Review 6.  Neurocognitive development in socioeconomic context: Multiple mechanisms and implications for measuring socioeconomic status.

Authors:  Alexandra Ursache; Kimberly G Noble
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Comparison of the effects of low childhood socioeconomic position and low adulthood socioeconomic position on self rated health in four European studies.

Authors:  Martin Hyde; Hrkal Jakub; Maria Melchior; Floor Van Oort; Simone Weyers
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  Black and white differences in cognitive function test scores: what explains the difference?

Authors:  Kala M Mehta; Eleanor M Simonsick; Ronica Rooks; Anne B Newman; Sandra K Pope; Susan M Rubin; Kristine Yaffe
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.562

9.  Perceived social position and health: Is there a reciprocal relationship?

Authors:  Dana Garbarski
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Subjective socioeconomic status and health: relationships reconsidered.

Authors:  Jenna Nobles; Miranda Ritterman Weintraub; Nancy E Adler
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 4.634

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.