Literature DB >> 12599918

Processing "d-linked" phrases.

Lyn Frazier1, Charles Clifton.   

Abstract

Linguists draw a distinction between two types of interrogatives: discourse linked (d-linked) phrases such as which man, which implies the existence of a set of contextually determined entities (men) from which the speaker is asking for a choice, and non-d-linked interrogatives such as who, which carry no such implication. Two questionnaires and an on-line reading study showed that readers prefer a d-linked phrase more than a non-d-linked phrase as the antecedent for a pronoun, suggesting that d-linked phrases are immediately instantiated in a discourse representation that is checked during the process of pronoun interpretation. Comparable difficulty is not observed for non-d-linked interrogatives. A questionnaire and an on-line listening study also showed that readers and listeners were more willing to accept a grammatical "island violation" containing a pronoun when the pronoun's antecedent was a d-linked interrogative than when the antecedent was non-d-linked, suggesting that they check a discourse representation for the pronoun antecedent. All results suggest that d-linked phrases are immediately interpreted in a discourse representation, not just in a syntactic representation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12599918     DOI: 10.1023/a:1021269122049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res        ISSN: 0090-6905


  5 in total

1.  Accessing singular antecedents in conjoined phrases.

Authors:  J E Albrecht; C Clifton
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-05

2.  Comprehending Conceptual Anaphors in Spanish.

Authors:  Manuel Carreiras; Morton Ann Gernsbacher
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  1992

3.  Representation, referentiality, and processing in agrammatic comprehension: two case studies.

Authors:  G Hickok; S Avrutin
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 2.381

4.  Thematic roles in sentence parsing.

Authors:  C Clifton
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  1993-06

5.  Favor referential representations.

Authors:  L Frazier; P McNamara
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.381

  5 in total
  8 in total

1.  Escape from the island: grammaticality and (reduced) acceptability of wh-island violations in Danish.

Authors:  Ken Ramshøj Christensen; Johannes Kizach; Anne Mette Nyvad
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2013-02

2.  On bound variable interpretations: the LF-only hypothesis.

Authors:  L Frazier; C Clifton
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2000-03

3.  THE SYNTAX-DISCOURSE DIVIDE: PROCESSING ELLIPSIS.

Authors:  Lyn Frazier; Charles Clifton
Journal:  Syntax       Date:  2005-08

4.  Processing Elided Verb Phrases with Flawed Antecedents: the Recycling Hypothesis.

Authors:  Ana Arregui; Charles Clifton; Lyn Frazier; Keir Moulton
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.059

5.  The Auditory Comprehension of Wh-Questions in Aphasia: Support for the Intervener Hypothesis.

Authors:  Shannon M Sheppard; Matthew Walenski; Tracy Love; Lewis P Shapiro
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  The pronoun attraction effect for d(iscourse)-linked phrases: evidence from speakers of a null subject language.

Authors:  Rodica Constanta Diaconescu; Helen Goodluck
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2004-07

7.  The D-linking effect on extraction from islands and non-islands.

Authors:  Grant Goodall
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-01-05

Review 8.  Backward Dependencies and in-Situ wh-Questions as Test Cases on How to Approach Experimental Linguistics Research That Pursues Theoretical Linguistics Questions.

Authors:  Leticia Pablos; Jenny Doetjes; Lisa L-S Cheng
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-01-11
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.