Literature DB >> 12599185

Waardenburg syndrome: clinical differentiation between types I and II.

Eliete Pardono1, Yolande van Bever, Jenneke van den Ende, Poti C Havrenne, Paula Iughetti, Sylvia R P Maestrelli, Orozimbo Costa F, Antonio Richieri-Costa, Oswaldo Frota-Pessoa, Paulo A Otto.   

Abstract

Here we present the results of a study performed on 59 patients affected by Waardenburg syndrome (WS), 30 with the I variant, 21 having the type II, and 8 of them being isolated cases without telecanthus. These patients belong to 37 families; the main contributions and conclusions are based on the detailed study of 25 of these families, examined using standard procedures. All patients were examined as to the presence of eight cardinal signs important for the diagnosis of the condition; from each patient, from many of his/her normal relatives, and from a control sample of 300 normal individuals stratified by age and sex, 23 different craniofacial measurements were obtained. We also estimated, using our own data as well those collected from the literature, the frequencies of the cardinal signs, based on a total sample of 461 affected individuals with WSI and 121 with WSII. In order to originate discriminant functions to separate individuals affected by one of the two variants, both metric (from craniofacial measurements) as well as categoric data (based on the frequencies of the cardinal signs or symptoms) were used. Discriminant analysis based on the frequency of the eight cardinal signs can improve the separation of WSI patients without telecanthus from those presenting the variant II. We present also a Table with the conditional probabilities favoring the diagnosis of WSI for suspect subjects without telecanthus and any combination of the other seven signs/symptoms. The discriminant function based on the four ocular measurements (inner and outer intercanthal, interpupillary, and inferior lacrymal distances), on the other side, perfectly classifies patients affected by one of the variants of WS, the same taking place when the average values of the W index of all affected individuals per family are used. The discriminant function based solely in the individual W index values of patients correctly classifies 93% of WSII subjects, but only 60% of the patients with the I variant of WS. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12599185     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.10193

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet A        ISSN: 1552-4825            Impact factor:   2.802


  10 in total

1.  Identification of a Novel De Novo Variant in the PAX3 Gene in Waardenburg Syndrome by Diagnostic Exome Sequencing: The First Molecular Diagnosis in Korea.

Authors:  Mi-Ae Jang; Taeheon Lee; Junnam Lee; Eun-Hae Cho; Chang-Seok Ki
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 3.464

2.  A Novel Pathogenic Variant in the MITF Gene Segregating with a Unique Spectrum of Ocular Findings in an Extended Iranian Waardenburg Syndrome Kindred.

Authors:  Nazanin Jalilian; Mohammad A Tabatabaiefar; Tayyeb Bahrami; Golaleh Karbasi; Mohammad H Bahramian; Abdolrahman Salimpoor; Mohammad R Noori-Daloii
Journal:  Mol Syndromol       Date:  2017-05-30

3.  Partial requirement of endothelin receptor B in spiral ganglion neurons for postnatal development of hearing.

Authors:  Michiru Ida-Eto; Nobutaka Ohgami; Machiko Iida; Ichiro Yajima; Mayuko Y Kumasaka; Kazutaka Takaiwa; Takashi Kimitsuki; Michihiko Sone; Tsutomu Nakashima; Toyonori Tsuzuki; Shizuo Komune; Masashi Yanagisawa; Masashi Kato
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Molecular and genetic characterization of a large Brazilian cohort presenting hearing loss.

Authors:  Ana Carla Batissoco; Vinicius Pedroso-Campos; Eliete Pardono; Juliana Sampaio-Silva; Cindy Yukimi Sonoda; Gleiciele Alice Vieira-Silva; Estefany Uchoa da Silva de Oliveira Longati; Diego Mariano; Ana Cristina Hiromi Hoshino; Robinson Koji Tsuji; Rafaela Jesus-Santos; Osório Abath-Neto; Ricardo Ferreira Bento; Jeanne Oiticica; Karina Lezirovitz
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 5.  Hearing impairments caused by genetic and environmental factors.

Authors:  Nobutaka Ohgami; Machiko Iida; Ichiro Yajima; Haruka Tamura; Kyoko Ohgami; Masashi Kato
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 3.674

6.  Whole-exome sequencing analysis of Waardenburg syndrome in a Chinese family.

Authors:  Dezhong Chen; Na Zhao; Jing Wang; Zhuoyu Li; Changxin Wu; Jie Fu; Han Xiao
Journal:  Hum Genome Var       Date:  2017-06-29

7.  New Genotypes and Phenotypes in Patients with 3 Subtypes of Waardenburg Syndrome Identified by Diagnostic Next-Generation Sequencing.

Authors:  Wu Li; Lingyun Mei; Hongsheng Chen; Xinzhang Cai; Yalan Liu; Meichao Men; Xue Zhong Liu; Denise Yan; Jie Ling; Yong Feng
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 3.599

8.  Analysis of genotype-phenotype relationships in 90 Chinese probands with Waardenburg syndrome.

Authors:  Guojian Wang; Xiaohong Li; Xue Gao; Yu Su; Mingyu Han; Bo Gao; Chang Guo; Dongyang Kang; Shasha Huang; Yongyi Yuan; Pu Dai
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 4.132

9.  The Hearing Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation in Waardenburg Syndrome.

Authors:  Hajime Koyama; Akinori Kashio; Aki Sakata; Katsuhiro Tsutsumiuchi; Yu Matsumoto; Shotaro Karino; Akinobu Kakigi; Shinichi Iwasaki; Tatsuya Yamasoba
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Identification of six novel variants in Waardenburg syndrome type II by next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Shumin Ren; Xiaojie Chen; Xiangdong Kong; Yibing Chen; Qinghua Wu; Zhihui Jiao; Huirong Shi
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 2.183

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.