Literature DB >> 12598350

A randomized phase II study of alternating and sequential regimens of docetaxel and doxorubicin as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer.

R Paridaens1, F Van Aelst, V Georgoulias, H Samonnig, V Cocquyt, C Zielinski, H Hausmaninger, P Willemse, Y Boudraa, J Wildiers, C Ramazeilles, N Azli.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This phase II study evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of alternating and sequential regimens of docetaxel and doxorubicin as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women with MBC requiring first-line chemotherapy for progressive disease (n = 106) were randomized and received 3-weekly monotherapy with docetaxel (T, 100 mg/m2, 1-h i.v. infusion) and doxorubicin (A, 75 mg/m2, 20-30-min i.v. infusion) either on a cycle-by-cycle alternating basis (ATATATAT, n = 51) or sequentially each for four cycles (TTTTAAAA, n = 55).
RESULTS: For both regimens, the median number of cycles administered was the maximum of eight. The alternating and sequential groups achieved similar objective tumor response rates (60% and 67%, respectively) and similar median duration of response (47 and 44 weeks, respectively). With a median follow-up of 31 months, median survival times were estimated at 20 and 26 months in the alternating and sequential groups, respectively. No unexpected toxicities were reported. Compared with alternating therapy, patients receiving sequential therapy were more likely to complete the planned eight chemotherapy cycles (69% versus 63%), and had a lower incidence of febrile neutropenia (2% versus 14%).
CONCLUSIONS: Alternating and sequential docetaxel-doxorubicin regimens are viable alternatives to simultaneous combination therapy in MBC, with sequential therapy achieving slightly higher response rates and improved tolerability compared with alternating therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12598350     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdg111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  5 in total

1.  Phase II Evaluation of Liposomal Doxorubicin with Docetaxel in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Julie Fasano; Dawn Hershman; Yelena Novik; Benjamin Levinson; Kim Blozie; Amy D Tiersten
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  A multicenter phase III prospective randomized trial of high-dose epirubicin in combination with cyclophosphamide (EC) versus docetaxel followed by EC in node-positive breast cancer. GOIM (Gruppo Oncologico Italia Meridionale) 9902 study.

Authors:  P Vici; M Brandi; F Giotta; P Foggi; F Schittulli; L Di Lauro; N Gebbia; B Massidda; G Filippelli; D Giannarelli; A Di Benedetto; M Mottolese; G Colucci; M Lopez
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 3.  Improving Cancer Treatment via Mathematical Modeling: Surmounting the Challenges Is Worth the Effort.

Authors:  Franziska Michor; Kathryn Beal
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  A phase II trial of docetaxel (Taxotere) as second-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Martina Baur; Allan T van Oosterom; Véronique Diéras; Michele Tubiana-Hulin; R Charles Coombes; Thomas Hatschek; Michael Murawsky; May Klink-Alakl; Marcus Hudec; Christian Dittrich
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  Docetaxel versus docetaxel alternating with gemcitabine as treatments of advanced breast cancer: final analysis of a randomised trial.

Authors:  H Joensuu; L Sailas; T Alanko; K Sunela; R Huuhtanen; M Utriainen; R Kokko; P Bono; T Wigren; S Pyrhönen; T Turpeenniemi-Hujanen; R Asola; M Leinonen; M Hahka-Kemppinen; P Kellokumpu-Lehtinen
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 32.976

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.