Literature DB >> 12597586

The relationship between amalgam restorations and mercury levels in male dentists and nondental health professionals.

Anil Joshi1, Chester W Douglass, Hyun-Duck Kim, Kaumudi J Joshipura, M Chu Park, Eric B Rimm, Michael J Carino, Raul I Garcia, J S Morris, Walter C Willett.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were: (1) to compare the mercury levels in general dentists with the mercury levels in other health professionals using toenail clippings as a biomarker, (2) to identify risk factors associated with high mercury levels, and (3) to compare practice characteristics of dentists with high and low mercury levels.
METHODS: A sample of 579 men was randomly selected from the 33,737 men participating in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study who had provided toenail samples in 1987. A questionnaire was sent to these male subjects in 1991 to obtain information on fish consumption, toothbrushing frequency, number of teeth, number of amalgam restorations, general practice or specialty status, number of amalgam restorations placed and removed per week, mercury storage and handling procedures, and mercury spillage incidents. A measure of long-term mercury exposure was obtained from toenail samples using neutron activation analysis for the 410 respondents (71% response rate). The 90th percentile mercury level in toenails (0.88 ppm) was selected as the threshold for elevated toenail mercury level.
RESULTS: No relationship was found between the number of dental amalgams and toenail mercury levels among general dentists, dental specialists, and nondental health professionals. General dentists were found to have more than twice the level of mercury in toenails than nondental health professionals (mean level = 0.94 vs 0.45) and 60 percent higher than dental specialists (mean = 0.59). The combined use of disposable capsules and water storage of scrap amalgam appeared to reduce the risk of elevated mercury levels. Regardless of professional status, consumption of tuna and saltwater fish were the primary exposure factors that were positively associated with toenail mercury levels.
CONCLUSIONS: As shown by the associations with dental profession and fish consumption, the mercury content of toenails is a stable biomarker of cumulative long-term mercury exposure. The lack of association between nail mercury levels and number of amalgam restorations suggests that avoidance of mercury amalgam restorative materials cannot be justified by the presence of mercury released from dental amalgams.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12597586     DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2003.tb03474.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Public Health Dent        ISSN: 0022-4006            Impact factor:   1.821


  14 in total

1.  Mercury exposure and risk of cardiovascular disease in two U.S. cohorts.

Authors:  Dariush Mozaffarian; Peilin Shi; J Steven Morris; Donna Spiegelman; Philippe Grandjean; David S Siscovick; Walter C Willett; Eric B Rimm
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  A Prospective Study of Toenail Trace Element Levels and Risk of Skin Cancer.

Authors:  Natalie H Matthews; Michelle Koh; Wen-Qing Li; Tricia Li; Walter C Willett; Meir J Stampfer; David C Christiani; J Steven Morris; Abrar A Qureshi; Eunyoung Cho
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Mercury exposure and risk of hypertension in US men and women in 2 prospective cohorts.

Authors:  Dariush Mozaffarian; Peilin Shi; J Steven Morris; Philippe Grandjean; David S Siscovick; Donna Spiegelman; Walter C Willett; Eric B Rimm; Gary C Curhan; John P Forman
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 10.190

4.  Demographic and lifestyle factors and selenium levels in men and women in the U.S.

Authors:  Kyong Park; Eric Rimm; David Siscovick; Donna Spiegelman; J Steven Morris; Dariush Mozaffarian
Journal:  Nutr Res Pract       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 1.926

5.  Associations of toenail arsenic, cadmium, mercury, manganese, and lead with blood pressure in the normative aging study.

Authors:  Irina Mordukhovich; Robert O Wright; Howard Hu; Chitra Amarasiriwardena; Andrea Baccarelli; Augusto Litonjua; David Sparrow; Pantel Vokonas; Joel Schwartz
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Methylmercury exposure and incident diabetes in U.S. men and women in two prospective cohorts.

Authors:  Dariush Mozaffarian; Peilin Shi; J Steven Morris; Philippe Grandjean; David S Siscovick; Donna Spiegelman; Frank B Hu
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 19.112

7.  Attitudes of dentists and interns in Riyadh to the use of dental amalgam.

Authors:  Fahad Alkhudhairy
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2016-11-17

8.  Mercury exposure and risk of cardiovascular disease: a nested case-control study in the PREDIMED (PREvention with MEDiterranean Diet) study.

Authors:  Mary K Downer; Miguel A Martínez-González; Alfredo Gea; Meir Stampfer; Julia Warnberg; Miguel Ruiz-Canela; Jordi Salas-Salvadó; Dolores Corella; Emilio Ros; Montse Fitó; Ramon Estruch; Fernando Arós; Miquel Fiol; José Lapetra; Lluís Serra-Majem; Monica Bullo; Jose V Sorli; Miguel A Muñoz; Antonio García-Rodriguez; Mario Gutierrez-Bedmar; Enrique Gómez-Gracia
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 2.298

9.  Chronologically matched toenail-Hg to hair-Hg ratio: temporal analysis within the Japanese community (U.S.).

Authors:  Thomas Hinners; Ami Tsuchiya; Alan H Stern; Thomas M Burbacher; Elaine M Faustman; Koenraad Mariën
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 5.984

Review 10.  Fish, mercury, selenium and cardiovascular risk: current evidence and unanswered questions.

Authors:  Dariush Mozaffarian
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.