Literature DB >> 12597383

Effects of implant regimens (trenbolone acetate-estradiol administered alone or in combination with zeranol) and vitamin D3 on fresh beef color and quality.

B A Reiling1, D D Johnson.   

Abstract

In the first oftwo experiments, 123 calf-fed steers were used over a 2-yr period to evaluate the effects of trenbolone acetate (TBA)-based implants administered alone or in combination with zeranol implants on fresh beef muscle quality, color, and physiological maturity of the carcass. Implant treatments decreased (P < 0.05) a* values (d 0 and d 3 of retail display) and b* values (d 0, d 1, and d 3 of retail display) after 14 d of aging. Carcasses from cattle initially implanted with Revalor-S and reimplanted with Revalor-S on d 60 of the finishing period showed increased lean and bone maturity scores and ash content of the 9th to 11th thoracic buttons and Warner-Bratzler shear force values (WBS) compared to those initially implanted with Ralgro and subsequently reimplanted with Revalor-S or control cattle. In addition, implants decreased (P < 0.05) marbling, percentage of the carcasses grading Choice, and kidney, pelvic, and heart fat (KPH). Implant treatments increased (P < 0.05) ADG, hot carcass weights, and longissimus muscle (LM) area. In the second experiment over a 2-yr period, 166 steers fed as yearlings were allotted to one of two implant treatments and one of two vitamin D3 preharvest supplementation treatments. Implanted steers had heavier (P < 0.05) final body weights and higher (P < 0.05) ADG, less (P < 0.05) KPH fat, and larger (P < 0.05) LM. Also, implanted steers had more (P < 0.05) advanced bone maturity scores, higher (P < 0.05) ash content of the 9th to 11th thoracic buttons, and higher (P < 0.05) WBS values on 5-d postmortem loin steaks. Vitamin D3 feeding decreased (P < 0.05) final live weight, ADG (P < 0.05), and LM (P < 0.05), but did not significantly improve WBS values. In Experiment 2, neither implant treatment nor vitamin D3 supplementation had significant effects on L*, a*, or b* values of muscles in steaks before or during simulated retail display.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12597383     DOI: 10.2527/2003.811135x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  2 in total

1.  Effects of hormonal growth promotants on beef quality: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ian J Lean; Helen M Golder; Natasha M Lees; Peter McGilchrist; Jose E P Santos
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Influence of Production Factors on Beef Primal Tissue Composition.

Authors:  Vipasha Sood; Argenis Rodas-González; Stephanie Lam; Óscar López-Campos; Jose Segura; Timothy Schwinghamer; Michael Dugan; John Basarab; Jennifer Aalhus; Manuel Juárez
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-02-11
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.