Literature DB >> 12597114

Simulating the effect of quarantine on the spread of the 1918-19 flu in central Canada.

Lisa Sattenspiel1, D Ann Herring.   

Abstract

Quarantine is often proposed and sometimes used to control the spread of infectious diseases through a human population. Yet there is usually little or no information on the effectiveness of attempting to quarantine humans that is not of an anecdotal or conjectural nature. This paper describes how a compartmental model for the geographic spread of infectious diseases can be used to address the potential effectiveness of human quarantine. The model is applied to data from the historical record in central Canada around the time of the 1918-19 influenza epidemic. Information on the daily mobility patterns of individuals engaged in the fur trade throughout the region prior to, during, and immediately after the epidemic are used to determine whether rates of travel were affected by informal quarantine policies imposed by community leaders. The model is then used to assess the impact of observed differences in travel on the spread of the epidemic. Results show that when mobility rates are very low, as in this region, quarantine practices must be highly effective before they alter disease patterns significantly. Simulation results suggest, though, that effectiveness varies depending on when the limitation on travel between communities is implemented and how long it lasts, and that a policy of introducing quarantine at the earliest possible time may not always lead to the greatest reduction in cases of a disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12597114     DOI: 10.1006/bulm.2002.0317

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull Math Biol        ISSN: 0092-8240            Impact factor:   1.758


  21 in total

1.  Attractivity of coherent manifolds in metapopulation models.

Authors:  C Connell McCluskey; David J D Earn
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 2.259

2.  Public health interventions and epidemic intensity during the 1918 influenza pandemic.

Authors:  Richard J Hatchett; Carter E Mecher; Marc Lipsitch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-04-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Continuous and discrete SIR-models with spatial distributions.

Authors:  Seong-Hun Paeng; Jonggul Lee
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 2.259

4.  A dynamic pandemic model evaluating reopening strategies amid COVID-19.

Authors:  Ling Zhong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Mitigation strategies for pandemic influenza A: balancing conflicting policy objectives.

Authors:  T Déirdre Hollingsworth; Don Klinkenberg; Hans Heesterbeek; Roy M Anderson
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Spatial dynamics of the 1918 influenza pandemic in England, Wales and the United States.

Authors:  Rosalind M Eggo; Simon Cauchemez; Neil M Ferguson
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Design of non-pharmaceutical intervention strategies for pandemic influenza outbreaks.

Authors:  Dayna L Martinez; Tapas K Das
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 8.  Modeling influenza epidemics and pandemics: insights into the future of swine flu (H1N1).

Authors:  Brian J Coburn; Bradley G Wagner; Sally Blower
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2009-06-22       Impact factor: 8.775

9.  Non-pharmaceutical interventions for pandemic influenza, national and community measures.

Authors:  David Bell; Angus Nicoll; Keiji Fukuda; Peter Horby; Arnold Monto; Frederick Hayden; Clare Wylks; Lance Sanders; Jonathan van Tam
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 6.883

10.  Connectivity sustains disease transmission in environments with low potential for endemicity: modelling schistosomiasis with hydrologic and social connectivities.

Authors:  David Gurarie; Edmund Y W Seto
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 4.118

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.