Literature DB >> 12596908

Changing the DNA landscape: putting a SPN on chromatin.

T Formosa1.   

Abstract

In eukaryotic cells, transcription and replication each occur on DNA templates that are incorporated into nucleosomes. Formation of chromatin generally limits accessibility of specific DNA sequences and inhibits progression of polymerases as they copy information from the DNA. The processes that select sites for initiating either transcription or replication are therefore strongly influenced by factors that modulate the properties of chromatin proteins. Further, in order to elongate their products, both DNA and RNA polymerases must be able to overcome the inhibition presented by chromatin (Lipford and Bell 2001; Workman and Kingston 1998). One way to adjust the properties of chromatin proteins is to covalently modify them by adding or removing chemical moieties. Both histone and non-histone chromatin proteins are altered by acetylation, methylation, and other changes, and the 'nucleosome modifying' complexes that perform these reactions are important components of pathways of transcriptional regulation (Cote 2002; Orphanides and Reinberg 2000; Roth et al. 2001; Strahl and Allis 2000; Workman and Kingston 1998). Another way to alter the effects of nucleosomes is to change the position of the histone octamers relative to specific DNA sequences (Orphanides and Reinberg 2000; Verrijzer 2002; Wang 2002; Workman and Kingston 1998). Since the ability of a sequence to be bound by specific proteins can vary significantly whether the sequence is in the linkers between nucleosomes or at various positions within a nucleosome, 'nucleosome remodeling' complexes that rearrange nucleosome positioning are also important regulators of transcription. Since the DNA replication machinery has to encounter many of the same challenges posed by chromatin, it seems likely that modifying and remodeling complexes also act during duplication of the genome, but most of the current information on these factors relates to regulation of transcription. This chapter describes the factor known variously as FACT in humans, where it promotes elongation of RNA polymerase II on nucleosomal templates in vitro (Orphanides et al. 1998, 1999), DUF in frogs, where it is needed for DNA replication in oocyte extracts (Okuhara et al. 1999), and CP or SPN in yeast, where it is linked in vivo to both transcription and replication (Brewster et al. 2001; Formosa et al. 2001). Like the nucleosome modifying and remodeling complexes, it is broadly conserved among eukaryotes, affects a wide range of processes that utilize chromatin, and directly alters the properties of nucleosomes. However, it does not have nucleosome modifying or standard ATP-dependent remodeling activity, and therefore represents a third class of chromatin modulating factors. It is also presently unique in the extensive connections it displays with both transcription and replication: FACT/DUF/CP/SPN appears to modify nucleosomes in a way that is directly important for the efficient functioning of both RNA polymerases and DNA polymerases. While less is known about the mechanisms it uses to promote its functions than for other factors that affect chromatin, it is clearly an essential part of the complex mixture of activities that modulate access to DNA within chromatin. Physical and genetic interactions suggest that FACT/DUF/CP/SPN affects multiple pathways within replication and transcription as a member of several distinct complexes. Some of the interactions are easy to assimilate into models for replication or transcription, such as direct binding to DNA polymerase alpha (Wittmeyer and Formosa 1997; Wittmeyer et al. 1999), association with nucleosome modifying complexes (John et al. 2000), and interaction with factors that participate in elongation of RNA Polymerase II (Gavin et al. 2002; Squazzo et al. 2002). Others are more surprising such as an association with the 19S complex that regulates the function of the 20S proteasome (Ferdous et al. 2001; Xu et al. 1995), and the indication that FACT/DUF/CP/SPN can act as a specificity factor for casein kinase II (Keller et al. 2001). This chapter reviews the varied approaches that have each revealed different aspects of the function of FACT/DUF/CP/SPN, and presents a picture of a factor that can both alter nucleosomes and orchestrate the assembly or activity of a broad range of complexes that act upon chromatin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12596908     DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-55747-7_7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol        ISSN: 0070-217X            Impact factor:   4.291


  19 in total

1.  Histone deacetylase activity is necessary for chromosome condensation during meiotic maturation in Xenopus laevis.

Authors:  Laura Magnaghi-Jaulin; Christian Jaulin
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2006-04-20       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Transcription factor binding and induced transcription alter chromosomal c-myc replicator activity.

Authors:  M Ghosh; G Liu; G Randall; J Bevington; M Leffak
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Opposing roles for Set2 and yFACT in regulating TBP binding at promoters.

Authors:  Debabrata Biswas; Rinku Dutta-Biswas; Doyel Mitra; Yoichiro Shibata; Brian D Strahl; Tim Formosa; David J Stillman
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  Schizosaccharomyces pombe mst2+ encodes a MYST family histone acetyltransferase that negatively regulates telomere silencing.

Authors:  Eliana B Gómez; Joaquín M Espinosa; Susan L Forsburg
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  A gene-specific requirement for FACT during transcription is related to the chromatin organization of the transcribed region.

Authors:  Silvia Jimeno-González; Fernando Gómez-Herreros; Paula M Alepuz; Sebastián Chávez
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2006-09-25       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 6.  Chromatin disassembly and reassembly during DNA repair.

Authors:  Jeffrey G Linger; Jessica K Tyler
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2007-01-21       Impact factor: 2.433

7.  A coordinated temporal interplay of nucleosome reorganization factor, sister chromatin cohesion factor, and DNA polymerase alpha facilitates DNA replication.

Authors:  Yanjiao Zhou; Teresa S-F Wang
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Structural features of nucleosomes reorganized by yeast FACT and its HMG box component, Nhp6.

Authors:  Alison R Rhoades; Susan Ruone; Tim Formosa
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  FACT prevents the accumulation of free histones evicted from transcribed chromatin and a subsequent cell cycle delay in G1.

Authors:  Macarena Morillo-Huesca; Douglas Maya; Mari Cruz Muñoz-Centeno; Rakesh Kumar Singh; Vincent Oreal; Gajjalaiahvari Ugander Reddy; Dun Liang; Vincent Géli; Akash Gunjan; Sebastián Chávez
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 5.917

Review 10.  Lessons from the genome sequence of Neurospora crassa: tracing the path from genomic blueprint to multicellular organism.

Authors:  Katherine A Borkovich; Lisa A Alex; Oded Yarden; Michael Freitag; Gloria E Turner; Nick D Read; Stephan Seiler; Deborah Bell-Pedersen; John Paietta; Nora Plesofsky; Michael Plamann; Marta Goodrich-Tanrikulu; Ulrich Schulte; Gertrud Mannhaupt; Frank E Nargang; Alan Radford; Claude Selitrennikoff; James E Galagan; Jay C Dunlap; Jennifer J Loros; David Catcheside; Hirokazu Inoue; Rodolfo Aramayo; Michael Polymenis; Eric U Selker; Matthew S Sachs; George A Marzluf; Ian Paulsen; Rowland Davis; Daniel J Ebbole; Alex Zelter; Eric R Kalkman; Rebecca O'Rourke; Frederick Bowring; Jane Yeadon; Chizu Ishii; Keiichiro Suzuki; Wataru Sakai; Robert Pratt
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 11.056

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.