Literature DB >> 12594749

Comparison of the return-to-the-origin probability and the apparent diffusion coefficient of water as indicators of necrosis in RIF-1 tumors.

Karl G Helmer1, Michael R Meiler, Christopher H Sotak, Joseph D Petruccelli.   

Abstract

Two model-independent measures of diffusion, the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and return-to-the-origin probability enhancement (R) were compared for their ability to detect tissue necrosis in RIF-1 murine tumors. Both reflect the degree of restriction experienced by the endogenous water molecules; however, the ADC is calculated from the initial linear slope of the diffusion attenuation curve, while R is calculated from data that includes the non-monoexponential part of the curve. In spectroscopic studies (n = 9), neither the ADC nor R showed a strong correlation with tumor volume. In imaging studies (n = 14), ADC, R, and T(2) were calculated on a pixel-by-pixel basis. There, the mean ADC and mean R for the entire imaging slice showed reasonable correlation with necrotic tumor fraction (r(2) = 0.679 and -0.665, respectively). The mean T(2) value yielded a poor correlation (r(2) = 0.436). Regions-of-interest were chosen from areas identified as either necrotic or viable and the resulting sets of ADC and R-values were subjected to discriminant analysis to determine the identification error rate. The error was greater for R than for the ADC (P < 0.001). Therefore, in this application, the use of the non-monoexponential part of the diffusion attenuation curve does not provide additional identification power. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12594749     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.10400

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  3 in total

1.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion MRI show rapid and dramatic changes in tumor microenvironment in response to inhibition of HIF-1alpha using PX-478.

Authors:  Bénédicte F Jordan; Matthew Runquist; Natarajan Raghunand; Amanda Baker; Ryan Williams; Lynn Kirkpatrick; Garth Powis; Robert J Gillies
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.715

2.  Application of 23Na MRI to monitor chemotherapeutic response in RIF-1 tumors.

Authors:  Andriy M Babsky; Shahryar K Hekmatyar; Hong Zhang; James L Solomon; Navin Bansal
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.715

3.  Diffusion-weighted PROPELLER MRI for quantitative assessment of liver tumor necrotic fraction and viable tumor volume in VX2 rabbits.

Authors:  Jie Deng; Sumeet Virmani; Joseph Young; Kathleen Harris; Guang-Yu Yang; Alfred Rademaker; Gayle Woloschak; Reed A Omary; Andrew C Larson
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.813

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.