Literature DB >> 12594717

BOLD-fMRI response vs. transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) pulse-train length: testing for linearity.

Daryl E Bohning1, Ananda Shastri, Mikhail P Lomarev, Jeffrey P Lorberbaum, Ziad Nahas, Mark S George.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To measure motor and auditory cortex blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) response to impulse-like transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) pulses as a function of train length.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Interleaved with fMRI at 1.5 T, TMS pulses 0.3-msec long were applied at 1 Hz to the motor cortex area for thumb. Six subjects were studied in a TR = 1 second session administering trains of 1, 2, 4, 8, and 16 pulses, and a TR = 3 seconds session administering trains of 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, and 24 pulses. A simple hemodynamic model with finite recovery and saturation was used to quantitatively characterize the BOLD-fMRI response as a function of train length.
RESULTS: In both the activations directly induced in motor cortex by TMS and the indirect activations in auditory cortex caused by the sound of the TMS coil firing, the BOLD-fMRI responses to multiple pulses were well described by a summation of single-pulse impulse functions.
CONCLUSION: Up to 24 discrete pulses, BOLD-fMRI response to 1 Hz TMS in both motor cortex and auditory cortex were consistent with a linear increase in amplitude and length with train length, possibly suggesting that stimuli of 1 to 2 seconds may be too long to represent impulses. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12594717     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.10271

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  12 in total

1.  Linearity of the fMRI response in category-selective regions of human visual cortex.

Authors:  Aidan J Horner; Timothy J Andrews
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Single pulse TMS to the DLPFC, compared to a matched sham control, induces a direct, causal increase in caudate, cingulate, and thalamic BOLD signal.

Authors:  Logan T Dowdle; Truman R Brown; Mark S George; Colleen A Hanlon
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2018-02-24       Impact factor: 8.955

3.  Using simultaneous repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy (rTMS/fNIRS) to measure brain activation and connectivity.

Authors:  F Andrew Kozel; Fenghua Tian; Sameer Dhamne; Paul E Croarkin; Shawn M McClintock; Alan Elliott; Kimberly S Mapes; Mustafa M Husain; Hanli Liu
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Efficient and robust identification of cortical targets in concurrent TMS-fMRI experiments.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Yau; Jun Hua; Diana A Liao; John E Desmond
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-03-16       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 5.  Mapping causal interregional influences with concurrent TMS-fMRI.

Authors:  Sven Bestmann; Christian C Ruff; Felix Blankenburg; Nikolaus Weiskopf; Jon Driver; John C Rothwell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Simultaneous TMS-fMRI of the Visual Cortex Reveals Functional Network, Even in Absence of Phosphene Sensation.

Authors:  E C Caparelli; W Backus; F Telang; G-J Wang; T Maloney; R Z Goldstein; D Anschel; F Henn
Journal:  Open Neuroimag J       Date:  2010-08-12

7.  A novel coil array for combined TMS/fMRI experiments at 3 T.

Authors:  Lucia I Navarro de Lara; Christian Windischberger; Andre Kuehne; Michael Woletz; Jürgen Sieg; Sven Bestmann; Nikolaus Weiskopf; Bernhard Strasser; Ewald Moser; Elmar Laistler
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  A reexamination of motor and prefrontal TMS in tobacco use disorder: Time for personalized dosing based on electric field modeling?

Authors:  Kevin A Caulfield; Xingbao Li; Mark S George
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 4.861

Review 9.  Combined neurostimulation and neuroimaging in cognitive neuroscience: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Sven Bestmann; Eva Feredoes
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 5.691

10.  Comparing TMS perturbations to occipital and parietal cortices in concurrent TMS-fMRI studies-Methodological considerations.

Authors:  Joana Leitão; Axel Thielscher; Johannes Tuennerhoff; Uta Noppeney
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.