Literature DB >> 12594614

[Fixation of periprosthetic femur fractures with the less invasive stabilization system (LISS)--a new minimally invasive treatment with locked fixed-angle screws].

W Kolb1, H Guhlmann, R Friedel, H Nestmann.   

Abstract

The Less Invasive Stabilization System (LISS) is a minimally invasive technique indicated for fixation of periprosthetic fractures. This new system allows percutaneous placement of cortical-shaft screws and fixation of the fracture with fixed-angle locked screws with minimal surgical exposure of the mostly osteoporotic bone and without disturbance of the existing total joint replacement. Immediate range-of-motion exercises are begun postoperatively. A retrospective clinical review of 5 patients (2 total hip arthroplasties, 3 total knee arthroplasties) was performed to describe indications, surgical technique, intra- and postoperative complications and patient follow-up. Indications are periprosthetic distal femur fractures, per- and supracondylar fractures. Contraindications are none, except existing medical comorbidities. Extraarticular fractures were treated via stab incisions over the lateral femoral condyle. Fractures with intraarticular displacement were fixed via an anterolateral parapatellar approach to the knee joint. After anatomic reduction of femoral condyles, articular fragments are fixed with Kirschner wires, followed by closed reduction aligning the articular fragments controlling length, axis and rotation. The LISS is introduced proximally under the M. vastus lateralis along the femur. It is fixed with self-drilling cortical shaft screws, locked fixed-angle screws both proximally and distally. Range-of-motion exercises are begun on the second day postoperatively. Time to full weight bearing averaged 6-8 weeks depending on clinical and radiological findings. Benefits of the LISS technique include the minimally invasive approach with increased primary stability using monocortical fixings thus eliminating the need for spongiosaplasty and blood transfusion. Disadvantages of the percutaneous placement of the LISS include malplacement on the femur, proximal screw pull-out and postoperative rotational and axial malalignment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12594614     DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-37320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zentralbl Chir        ISSN: 0044-409X            Impact factor:   0.942


  6 in total

1.  Plate failure following plate osteosynthesis in periprosthetic femoral fractures.

Authors:  Sandra Boesmueller; Sebastian F Baumbach; Marcus Hofbauer; Gerald E Wozasek
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 1.704

2.  Periprosthetic fracture around a stable femoral stem treated with locking plate osteosynthesis: distal femoral locking plate alone versus with cerclage cable.

Authors:  Young-Soo Shin; Seung-Beom Han
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-01-16

3.  [Periprosthetic fractures in patients with rheumatoid arthritis].

Authors:  G Pap; H W Neumann
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.372

4.  [Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty with specially constructed retrograde hollow nails].

Authors:  G Szalay; C Meyer; J Mika; R Schnettler; U Thormann
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 1.154

5.  Management of distal femoral periprosthetic fractures by distal femoral locking plate: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Rajiv Thukral; Sks Marya; Chandeep Singh
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.251

6.  Prognostic Factors and Clinical Outcomes after Treatment of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures Using a Cable-plate.

Authors:  Joon Soon Kang; Kyoung-Ho Moon; Bong Sung Ko; Tae Hoon Roh; Yeop Na; Yung-Hun Youn; Joo Hyun Park
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2019-08-29
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.