Literature DB >> 12594613

[Cemented versus uncemented hip replacement--rational decision making using the BiCONTACT total hip system].

K Weise1, C Eingartner, E Winter.   

Abstract

The BiCONTACT femoral stem has been developed as a modular system which is suitable for both cemented and uncemented implantation. A highly standardized procedure using an identical set of instruments for both modes of fixation ensures bone preservation. Primary stability is achieved by special design parameters. The cementless implants are coated proximally, thus facilitating osteointegration and proximal load transfer. Cemented stems provide an identical design but a smooth surface and are anchored by a homogenous cement mantle. The BiCONTACT stem is in use in the BG Trauma Center Tuebingen since 14 years and a consecutive series of 250 cases (series A) with uncemented implantation and of 250 cases (series B) with cemented implantation has been analyzed in two different prospective follow-up studies. Long-term survival after 11 years was 97.1 % (95 % confidence limits: 93.8 %-98.7 %) for series A, the follow-up rate was 99.2 %. For series B, the follow up-rate was also 99.2 %, survival estimate after 11 years was 97.5 % (95 % CI: 94.2 %-99.0 %).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12594613     DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-37319

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zentralbl Chir        ISSN: 0044-409X            Impact factor:   0.942


  3 in total

1.  Factors affecting the interface of cervical spine facet screws placed in the technique by Roy-Camille et al.

Authors:  T R Pitzen; S Zenner; D Barbier; T Georg; W I Steudel
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-03-27       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  [Cement-free and cemented Excia hip shaft prosthesis: comparison of intermediate term results].

Authors:  C Urschel; M Döring; W Strecker
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 3.  Early subsidence of shape-closed hip arthroplasty stems is associated with late revision. A systematic review and meta-analysis of 24 RSA studies and 56 survival studies.

Authors:  Paul van der Voort; Bart G Pijls; Marc J Nieuwenhuijse; Jorrit Jasper; Marta Fiocco; Josepha W M Plevier; Saskia Middeldorp; Edward R Valstar; Rob G H H Nelissen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.717

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.