Literature DB >> 12594547

Experimental colonic phantom for the evaluation of the optimal scanning technique for CT colonography using a multidetector spiral CT equipment.

Andrea Laghi1, Riccardo Iannaccone, Filippo Mangiapane, Francesca Piacentini, Sante Iori, Roberto Passariello.   

Abstract

Our objective was to optimize a scanning protocol for CT colonography using a multidetector scanner with an adaptive-array matrix in a phantom study. A colonic phantom with 27 simulated lesions was examined using a multidetector CT scanner (Somatom Plus 4 Volume Zoom, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). Three scanning protocols were tested: (a) collimation 1.0 mm, slice thickness 1.0 mm; (b) collimation 2.5 mm, slice thickness 3.0 mm; and (c) collimation 2.5 mm, slice thickness 5.0 mm. Image analysis was performed by two radiologists blinded to the construction of the phantom and to imaging parameters. Sensitivity for lesion detection and image quality was assessed. Computed tomographic colonography detected 27 of 27 lesions with protocol 1 (sensitivity 100%); 26 of 27 lesions with protocol 2 (sensitivity 96.3%); and 23 of 27 lesions with protocol 3 (sensitivity 85.2%). Image quality was graded as optimal for protocol 1, good for protocol 2, and poor for protocol 3. When multidetector CT equipment with an adaptive-array matrix is used, protocols with 1.0- or 3.0-mm slice thickness have a sensitivity for the detection of lesions higher than that obtained with a 5.0-mm slice thickness. Image quality decreases progressively when the slice thickness is increased; therefore, in a clinical setting, we recommend the use of a high-resolution protocol (1.0-mm effective slice thickness) with the highest pitch value in order to reduce scanning time. Dose exposure for such a protocol if combined with 80 mAs is within the range limits recommended by the ICRP for abdominal CT scanning.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12594547     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-002-1671-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  4 in total

1.  Automated mass detection in contrast-enhanced CT colonography: an approach based on contrast and volume.

Authors:  W Luboldt; C Tryon; M Kroll; T L Toussaint; K Holzer; N Hoepffner; T J Vogl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Current status of CT colonography.

Authors:  Suzanne M Frentz; Ronald M Summers
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Investigating the relationship between virtual cystoscopy image quality and CT slice thickness.

Authors:  S Lalondrelle; S A Sohaib; I A Castellano; D Mears; R Huddart; V Khoo
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Computed Tomography Colonography Phantom: Construction, Validation and Literature Review.

Authors:  Lukas Lambert; Alena Lambertova; Jan Danes; Gabriela Grusova
Journal:  Iran J Radiol       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 0.212

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.