Literature DB >> 12593694

A pilot study to determine the feasibility of continuous cefazolin infusion.

Todd Waltrip1, Robert Lewis, Vyvy Young, Martin Farmer, Susan Clayton, Steven Myers, Laman A Gray, Susan Galandiuk.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Animal studies have shown that continuous infusion of beta-lactam antibiotics is more effective than intermittent dosing. We studied several dosing regimens of cefazolin in humans to determine safety and whether or not adequate serum and tissue antibiotic concentrations could be achieved in patients undergoing cardiac bypass.
METHODS: A prospective, randomized pilot study was conducted at a university-affiliated teaching hospital over a 2-year period in patients undergoing first-time coronary artery bypass grafting. One hundred and thirty-seven patients were randomized to one of three groups. Group 1 (n = 64) received 1 g of cefazolin intravenously before operation and 1 g intravenously at the end of cardiopulmonary bypass. Group 2 (n = 35) received 2 g of cefazolin intravenously before operation, followed by a continuous intravenous infusion of cefazolin at 20 mg/min throughout surgery. Group 3 (n = 38) received 3 g of cefazolin intravenously before operation, followed by a continuous intravenous infusion of cefazolin at 15 mg/min throughout surgery. Venous blood and subcutaneous fat samples were obtained from the sternal wound in a subset of 34 patients at incision, 0.25 h, 0.5 h, and 1 h; at the end of cardiopulmonary bypass; and at wound closure. Venous blood was sampled in the recovery room and on postoperative day 1. Cefazolin concentrations in the samples were determined by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography using a C18 column.
RESULTS: Serum cefazolin concentrations were higher for group 3 when compared with group 1 at all six intraoperative intervals (p < 0.02) and for group 2 when compared with group 1 at four of six intraoperative intervals (p < 0.04). When compared with group 1, tissue cefazolin concentrations were higher for group 3 at all intraoperative intervals (p < 0.02). No related toxicity or adverse events were observed.
CONCLUSION: Cefazolin administered as a large preoperative bolus with continuous intraoperative infusion resulted in higher serum and tissue concentrations when compared with conventional intermittent dosing. Pharmacodynamically, continuous infusion of beta-lactam antibiotics may be superior to intermittent dosing when used for perioperative prophylaxis against wound infection, especially for cases in which the antibiotic is not redosed intraoperatively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12593694     DOI: 10.1089/109629602753681104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)        ISSN: 1096-2964            Impact factor:   2.150


  10 in total

1.  Who, what, when, where, why, and how? The unanswered questions of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis.

Authors:  Titus L Daniels; Thomas R Talbot; William Schaffner
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.725

Review 2.  Continuous versus intermittent intravenous administration of antibacterials with time-dependent action: a systematic review of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters.

Authors:  Sofia K Kasiakou; Kenneth R Lawrence; Nicolaos Choulis; Matthew E Falagas
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Association between Pre-Operative Cefazolin Dose and Surgical Site Infection in Obese Patients.

Authors:  William J Peppard; David G Eberle; Nathan W Kugler; Danielle M Mabrey; John A Weigelt
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.150

4.  A validated LC-MS/MS method for the quantitation of cefazolin in human adipose tissue: Application of EMR-Lipid sorbent as an efficient sample clean-up before mass spectrometric analyses.

Authors:  Anna Siemiątkowska; Andrew Wassef; Ragui Sadek; Celine Park; Christine Yohn; Luigi Brunetti; Leonid Kagan
Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 3.571

5.  Continuous cefazolin infusion to treat bone and joint infections: clinical efficacy, feasibility, safety, and serum and bone concentrations.

Authors:  Valérie Zeller; Frédérick Durand; Marie-Dominique Kitzis; Luc Lhotellier; Jean-Marc Ziza; Patrick Mamoudy; Nicole Desplaces
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Antibiotic prophylaxis in bariatric surgery with continuous infusion of cefazolin: determination of concentration in adipose tissue.

Authors:  Rafael Anlicoara; Álvaro A B Ferraz; Kilma da P Coelho; José L de Lima Filho; Luciana T Siqueira; José G C de Araújo; Josemberg M Campos; Edmundo M Ferraz
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  Cefazolin Concentration in the Mediastinal Adipose Tissue of Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery.

Authors:  Rodrigo Mezzalira Tchaick; Michel Pompeu Barros Oliveira Sá; Fernando Ribeiro de Moraes Figueira; Kilma Coelho Paz; Álvaro Antonio Bandeira Ferraz; Fernando Ribeiro de Moraes
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug

Review 8.  Continuous versus intermittent infusions of antibiotics for the treatment of severe acute infections.

Authors:  Jennifer Shiu; Erica Wang; Aaron M Tejani; Michael Wasdell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-03-28

9.  Comparison of the Effectiveness of Continuous versus Intermittent Cefazolin for the Prevention of Infection after Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft.

Authors:  Seyed Khalil Forouzannia; Ali Akbar Karimi-Bondarabadi; Mostafa Bagherinasab; Mohammadtaghi Sarebanhassanabadi
Journal:  J Tehran Heart Cent       Date:  2014-07-03

10.  Improving intraoperative administration of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis: a quality improvement report.

Authors:  Victoria Haney; Stephan Maman; Jansie Prozesky; Dmitri Bezinover; Kunal Karamchandani
Journal:  BMJ Open Qual       Date:  2020-09
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.