Literature DB >> 12593679

Optimized simulation of the control of tsetse flies Glossina pallidipes and G. m. morsitans (Diptera: Glossinidae) using odour-baited targets in Zimbabwe.

J W Hargrove1.   

Abstract

In 1984-1985 insecticide-treated targets were deployed in the 600-km2 Rifa Triangle, Zambezi Valley, Zimbabwe. Trap catches of Glossina pallidipes Austen were modelled using a function combining logistic growth with diffusive movement. A simulation routine was linked to a non-linear least-squares optimization programme and fits optimized with respect to population carrying capacities, rates of growth and movement, and to levels of imposed mortality. In March-September 1984, the overall additional mortality was 2% per day of adult female G. pallidipes, increasing thereafter to 8% per day, due to the deployment of more targets, the onset of the hot, dry season and the ground-spraying of the adjoining Zambezi escarpment with DDT. For G. m. morsitans Westwood the corresponding estimates were 1 and 2% per day. For both species, the deployment of four targets km(-2) in a closed population will ensure eradication. For G. m. morsitans a halving of target efficacy would reduce the killing rate to the point where eradication would be unlikely. Estimated daily displacements were c. 200 m for G. m. morsitans and 660 m for G. pallidipes. The lower rate for G. m. morsitans means that, while targets kill this species less effectively, re-invasion of cleared areas is slower. Targets do not markedly affect robust populations outside the deployment area. The Zambian tsetse population adjacent to the Rifa Triangle declined markedly during the experiment, however, suggesting that it is largely maintained by immigration. The methods developed here will be applied to data from other campaigns with the aim of improving the efficiency of tsetse control programmes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12593679     DOI: 10.1079/BER2002205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull Entomol Res        ISSN: 0007-4853            Impact factor:   1.750


  7 in total

1.  Macrogeographic population structure of the tsetse fly, Glossina pallidipes (Diptera: Glossinidae).

Authors:  J O Ouma; J G Marquez; E S Krafsur
Journal:  Bull Entomol Res       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.750

2.  Tsetse Fly Control in Kenya's Spatially and Temporally Dynamic Control Reservoirs: A Cost Analysis.

Authors:  Paul F McCord; Joseph P Messina; David J Campbell; Sue C Grady
Journal:  Appl Geogr       Date:  2011-12-07

3.  Is the even distribution of insecticide-treated cattle essential for tsetse control? Modelling the impact of baits in heterogeneous environments.

Authors:  Steve J Torr; Glyn A Vale
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2011-10-18

4.  Standardizing visual control devices for tsetse flies: West African species Glossina tachinoides, G. palpalis gambiensis and G. morsitans submorsitans.

Authors:  Jean-Baptiste Rayaisse; Thomas Kröber; Andrew McMullin; Philippe Solano; Steve Mihok; Patrick M Guerin
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2012-02-14

5.  Negative density-dependent dispersal in tsetse (Glossina spp): An artefact of inappropriate analysis.

Authors:  John W Hargrove; John Van Sickle; Glyn A Vale; Eric R Lucas
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2021-03-25

6.  The impact of habitat fragmentation on tsetse abundance on the plateau of eastern Zambia.

Authors:  E Ducheyne; C Mweempwa; C De Pus; H Vernieuwe; R De Deken; G Hendrickx; P Van den Bossche
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 2.670

7.  Glossina palpalis palpalis populations from Equatorial Guinea belong to distinct allopatric clades.

Authors:  Carlos Cordon-Obras; Jorge Cano; Jenny Knapp; Paloma Nebreda; Nicolas Ndong-Mabale; Policarpo Ricardo Ncogo-Ada; Pedro Ndongo-Asumu; Miguel Navarro; Joao Pinto; Agustin Benito; Jean-Mathieu Bart
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 3.876

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.