OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate laryngotracheal stenoses in the long-term outcome after percutaneous tracheostomy. METHODS: Between 1997 and 2000, 162 patients were tracheostomized during their postoperative stay at the intensive care unit of the Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Heidelberg. Thirty-eight of 80 long-term surviving patients (mean follow-up: 22 months, range: 7-50 months) gave their informed consent to follow-up laryngotracheoscopy. By using this technique, we localized the tracheostomy site, evaluated the laryngotracheal morphology, and quantified laryngotracheal stenosis planimetrically. RESULTS: Clinically relevant stenoses were found in one patient. Another patient had undergone surgical revision of the percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) prior to our examination. The endoscopic examination revealed that 89.5% (34/38) of the patients exhibited tracheal stenosis, less than 25% without clinical symptoms. Despite endoscopic guidance during PDT, the location of the puncture site was found to vary greatly. Cricoidal lesions were identified in 15 patients. In only 12 patients (31.6%), the PDT had been placed at the optimal location between the first and the second tracheal ring. In these patients, we found the lowest rate of tracheal stenosis in tracheotomies without fractured tracheal rings. CONCLUSION: Since clinically relevant tracheal stenosis has been found to depend mainly on the puncture site of the PDT and tracheal fractures during PDT, we want to emphasize the importance of adequate endoscopic guidance during and the careful performance of the PDT. Further follow-up studies are necessary to improve and ensure the quality of PDT techniques.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate laryngotracheal stenoses in the long-term outcome after percutaneous tracheostomy. METHODS: Between 1997 and 2000, 162 patients were tracheostomized during their postoperative stay at the intensive care unit of the Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Heidelberg. Thirty-eight of 80 long-term surviving patients (mean follow-up: 22 months, range: 7-50 months) gave their informed consent to follow-up laryngotracheoscopy. By using this technique, we localized the tracheostomy site, evaluated the laryngotracheal morphology, and quantified laryngotracheal stenosis planimetrically. RESULTS: Clinically relevant stenoses were found in one patient. Another patient had undergone surgical revision of the percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) prior to our examination. The endoscopic examination revealed that 89.5% (34/38) of the patients exhibited tracheal stenosis, less than 25% without clinical symptoms. Despite endoscopic guidance during PDT, the location of the puncture site was found to vary greatly. Cricoidal lesions were identified in 15 patients. In only 12 patients (31.6%), the PDT had been placed at the optimal location between the first and the second tracheal ring. In these patients, we found the lowest rate of tracheal stenosis in tracheotomies without fractured tracheal rings. CONCLUSION: Since clinically relevant tracheal stenosis has been found to depend mainly on the puncture site of the PDT and tracheal fractures during PDT, we want to emphasize the importance of adequate endoscopic guidance during and the careful performance of the PDT. Further follow-up studies are necessary to improve and ensure the quality of PDT techniques.