Literature DB >> 12592580

Symptoms and sense of coherence--a follow-up study of personnel from workplace buildings with indoor air problems.

R Runeson1, D Norbäck, H Stattin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim was to study prevalence and change of symptoms in buildings with suspected indoor air problems in relation to sense of coherence (SOC), a psychological measure of a life attitude.
METHODS: A cohort of 194 subjects initially working in 19 Swedish buildings with indoor environmental problems was followed from 1988 to 1998. Information on 16 symptoms compatible with sick building syndrome (SBS) was gathered by an initial questionnaire mailed between 1988 and 1992. The same symptom questionnaire, as well as Antonovsky's SOC, was administered in a postal follow-up study in 1998. The prevalence of symptoms and the change (incidence) plus reminiscence of symptoms were calculated for individual symptoms and a total symptom score (SC). Bivariate analyses, as well as multiple linear and logistic regression analyses, were applied and adjusted for age, gender, history of atopy and tobacco smoking.
RESULTS: SBS was more common in women, younger subjects and those with a history of atopy. A low SOC was related to a higher prevalence of ocular, nasal, and throat symptoms, tiredness, and headache. In addition, subjects with a low SOC developed more symptoms during the follow-up period. Women had a lower SOC value, but there was no relation between SOC and age, smoking, doctor's diagnosed asthma or a history of atopy. Subjects leaving the problem buildings during the follow-up period had a decrease in symptoms and were more often non-smokers, but had the same mean SOC score as those remaining in the same workplace.
CONCLUSIONS: The study indicates that SOC can detect personal vulnerability in relation to suspected environmental stress. Symptoms reported in the buildings with suspected indoor air problems are partly reversible, as indicated by the reduction of symptoms among those leaving these buildings. A multi-disciplinary approach including personality aspects, allergic disorders and indoor exposures should be applied in investigations of buildings with suspected indoor air problems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12592580     DOI: 10.1007/s00420-002-0372-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health        ISSN: 0340-0131            Impact factor:   3.015


  7 in total

Review 1.  Antonovsky's sense of coherence scale and the relation with health: a systematic review.

Authors:  Monica Eriksson; Bengt Lindström
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  The sick building syndrome: a chicken and egg situation?

Authors:  Charlotte Brauer; Henrik Kolstad; Palle Ørbaek; Sigurd Mikkelsen
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2006-01-12       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Relation of dampness to sick building syndrome in Japanese public apartment houses.

Authors:  Yasuaki Saijo; Yoshihiko Nakagi; Toshihiro Ito; Yoshihiko Sugioka; Hitoshi Endo; Takahiko Yoshida
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 3.674

4.  Sick building syndrome (SBS) and sick house syndrome (SHS) in relation to psychosocial stress at work in the Swedish workforce.

Authors:  Roma Runeson-Broberg; Dan Norbäck
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2012-11-11       Impact factor: 3.015

5.  Asthma related to workplace dampness and impaired work ability.

Authors:  Kirsi Karvala; Henrik Nordman; Ritva Luukkonen; Jukka Uitti
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 3.015

6.  Sense of coherence and biomarkers of health in 43-year-old women.

Authors:  Petra Lindfors; Olle Lundberg; Ulf Lundberg
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2005

7.  Building health: an epidemiological study of "sick building syndrome" in the Whitehall II study.

Authors:  A F Marmot; J Eley; M Stafford; S A Stansfeld; E Warwick; M G Marmot
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.402

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.