Literature DB >> 12592247

Can ultrasound replace dilation and curettage? A longitudinal evaluation of postmenopausal bleeding and transvaginal sonographic measurement of the endometrium as predictors of endometrial cancer.

B Gull1, B Karlsson, I Milsom, S Granberg.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate postmenopausal bleeding and transvaginal sonographic measurement of endometrial thickness as predictors of endometrial cancer and atypical hyperplasia in women whose cases were followed for > or =10 years after referral for postmenopausal bleeding. STUDY
DESIGN: Women (n = 394) who had postmenopausal bleeding from November 1987 to October 1990 underwent transvaginal sonographic measurement of endometrial thickness and curettage. It was possible to assess the medical records (regarding recurrence of a postmenopausal bleeding, development of endometrial cancer, and death) in 339 of the 394 women (86%) > or =10 years after referral for postmenopausal bleeding.
RESULTS: Thirty-nine of the 339 women (11.5%) had endometrial cancer, and 5 women (1.5%) had atypical hyperplasia. The relative risk of endometrial cancer in women who were referred for postmenopausal bleeding was 63.9 (95% CI, 46.0-88.8); the corresponding relative risk for endometrial cancer and atypical hyperplasia together was 72.1 (95% CI, 52.8-98.5) compared with women of the same age from the general population of the same region of Sweden. No woman with an endometrial thickness of < or =4 mm was diagnosed as having endometrial cancer. The relative risk of the development of endometrial cancer in women with an endometrial thickness of >4 mm was 44.5 (95% CI, 6.5-320.1) compared with women with an endometrial thickness of < or =4 mm. The reliability of endometrial thickness (cutoff value, < or =4 mm) as a diagnostic test for endometrial cancer was assessed: Sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 60%; positive predictive value, 25%; and negative predictive value, 100%. The incidence of endometrial cancer or atypical hyperplasia in women with an intact uterus whose cases had been followed for > or =10 years was 5.8% (15/257 women) compared with 22.7% (15/66 women) in women who had < or =1 episode of recurrent bleeding. No endometrial cancer was diagnosed in women with a recurrent postmenopausal bleeding who had an endometrial thickness of < or =4 mm at the initial scan.
CONCLUSION: Postmenopausal bleeding incurs a 64-fold increase risk for endometrial cancer. There was no increased risk of endometrial cancer or atypia in women who did not have recurrent bleeding, whereas women with recurrent bleeding were a high-risk group. No endometrial cancer was missed when endometrial thickness measurement (cutoff value, < or =4 mm) was used, even if the women were followed up for < or =10 years. We conclude that transvaginal sonographic scanning is an excellent tool for the determination of whether further investigation with curettage or some form of endometrial biopsy is necessary

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12592247     DOI: 10.1067/mob.2003.154

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  17 in total

1.  Correlation of Endometrial Thickness with the Histopathological Pattern of Endometrium in Postmenopausal Bleeding.

Authors:  Pushpa Singh; Pooja Dwivedi; Shweta Mendiratta
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2014-11-04

Review 2.  Management of endometrial precancers.

Authors:  Cornelia L Trimble; Michael Method; Mario Leitao; Karen Lu; Olga Ioffe; Moss Hampton; Robert Higgins; Richard Zaino; George L Mutter
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Risk factors for developing endometrial cancer after benign endometrial sampling.

Authors:  Michelle L Torres; Amy L Weaver; Sanjeev Kumar; Stefano Uccella; Abimbola O Famuyide; William A Cliby; Sean C Dowdy; Bobbie S Gostout; Andrea Mariani
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Histopathology of women with non-uniform endometrial echogenicity and risk factors for atypical endometrial hyperplasia and carcinoma.

Authors:  Qing Cong; Lingxiao Luo; Zhongpeng Fu; Jiaqi Lu; Wei Jiang; Long Sui
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 4.060

5.  The Impact of Fibroids and Histologic Subtype on the Performance of US Clinical Guidelines for the Diagnosis of Endometrial Cancer among Black Women.

Authors:  Sarah S Romano; Kemi M Doll
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 1.847

Review 6.  Clinical evaluation of women with PMB. Is it always necessary an endometrial biopsy to be performed? A review of the literature.

Authors:  Marina Dimitraki; Panagiotis Tsikouras; Sophia Bouchlariotou; Alexandros Dafopoulos; Vasileios Liberis; Georgios Maroulis; Alexander Tobias Teichmann
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 2.344

7.  The use of new and old ultrasound techniques in the assessment of women with postmenopausal bleeding.

Authors:  Elisabeth Epstein
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-12-31

8.  MR staging of endometrial cancer: needed or wanted?

Authors:  John A Spencer; Christina Messiou; Sarah E Swift
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 3.909

9.  Factors influencing endometrial thickness in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  S Hebbar; V Chaya; L Rai; A Ramachandran
Journal:  Ann Med Health Sci Res       Date:  2014-07

10.  The yield of endometrial aspiration in women with various risk factors and bleeding abnormalities.

Authors:  Anita L Nelson; Lisa Vasquez; Roya Tabatabai; Samuel S Im
Journal:  Contracept Reprod Med       Date:  2016-06-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.