Literature DB >> 12592237

Use of health services associated with increased menstrual loss in the United States.

Isabelle Côté1, Philip Jacobs, David C Cumming.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The study was conducted to estimate the effect of abnormal uterine bleeding on health care use. STUDY
DESIGN: Data were taken from the National Health Interview Survey 1999, a nationwide representative sample of the civilian noninstitutionalized population of the United States. The participants who were eligible for the study were 3133 women aged between 18 and 64 years who reported having a natural menstrual period in the last 12 months and in the last 3 months, never having taken medication containing estrogen (except past use of oral contraceptives), and never been told they had reproductive cancer. From these, 328 women were excluded-5 women because they were more than 64 years old and 323 because of the imprecision of their answers related to their menstrual flow. Analysis was performed with the data from 2805 women: 373 having self-described heavy flow and 2432 having normal flow.
RESULTS: Age, family size, insurance coverage, perception of health, and flow of menstrual periods are associated with the majority of questions used to measure health care use (P < or =.05). The odds ratios related to the flow of menstrual periods were all equal to or higher than 1.45 (P < or =.05), which indicates that women who have a heavier flow are at least 1.45 times as likely to use health care as are women who have a lighter or normal flow.
CONCLUSION: Women having heavy flow of menstrual bleeding are more likely to use health care than women having a normal flow.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12592237     DOI: 10.1067/mob.2003.92

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  20 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review comparing hysterectomy with less-invasive treatments for abnormal uterine bleeding.

Authors:  Kristen A Matteson; Husam Abed; Thomas L Wheeler; Vivian W Sung; David D Rahn; Joseph I Schaffer; Ethan M Balk
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 4.137

Review 2.  The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in heavy menstrual bleeding: a benefit-risk review.

Authors:  Andrew M Kaunitz; Pirjo Inki
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2012-01-22       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Practice patterns and attitudes about treating abnormal uterine bleeding: a national survey of obstetricians and gynecologists.

Authors:  Kristen A Matteson; Britta L Anderson; Stephanie B Pinto; Vrishali Lopes; Jay Schulkin; Melissa A Clark
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-05-14       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Questioning our questions: do frequently asked questions adequately cover the aspects of women's lives most affected by abnormal uterine bleeding? Opinions of women with abnormal uterine bleeding participating in focus group discussions.

Authors:  Kristen A Matteson; Melissa A Clark
Journal:  Women Health       Date:  2010-03

5.  Abnormal uterine bleeding, health status, and usual source of medical care: analyses using the Medical Expenditures Panel Survey.

Authors:  Kristen A Matteson; Christina A Raker; Melissa A Clark; Kevin D Frick
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 2.681

6.  Prevalence and knowledge of heavy menstrual bleeding among African American women.

Authors:  Erica E Marsh; Maureen E Brocks; Marissa S Ghant; Hannah S Recht; Melissa Simon
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 3.561

Review 7.  Systematic review highlights difficulty interpreting diverse clinical outcomes in abnormal uterine bleeding trials.

Authors:  David D Rahn; Husam Abed; Vivian W Sung; Kristen A Matteson; Rebecca G Rogers; Michelle Y Morrill; Matthew D Barber; Joseph I Schaffer; Thomas L Wheeler; Ethan M Balk; Katrin Uhlig
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 6.437

8.  Efficacy of bipolar radiofrequency endometrial ablation vs thermal balloon ablation for management of menorrhagia: A population-based cohort.

Authors:  Sherif A El-Nashar; Matthew R Hopkins; Douglas J Creedon; William A Cliby; Abimbola O Famuyide
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.137

Review 9.  Abnormal uterine bleeding: a review of patient-based outcome measures.

Authors:  Kristen A Matteson; Lori A Boardman; Malcolm G Munro; Melissa A Clark
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 10.  Classification of menstrual bleeding disorders.

Authors:  Malcolm G Munro
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 6.514

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.