Literature DB >> 12592045

Comparison of endothelial cell count using confocal and contact specular microscopy.

Christina M C Klais1, Jens Bühren, Thomas Kohnen.   

Abstract

Precise examination of the corneal endothelium has become increasingly important due to the growing number of intraocular and corneal procedures. The purpose of this study was to compare prospectively the corneal endothelial cell count in normal eyes obtained by confocal and specular microscopy. Central corneal endothelial cell densities of 42 eyes from 42 patients were measured by confocal and contact specular microscopy. Endothelial cells were analyzed with the same software in a manual, an automated and a semi-automated mode. The mean endothelial cell density obtained by confocal microscopy was (in the manual, automated and semi-automated modes) 3,069 +/- 285, 2,791 +/- 344 and 3,077 +/- 286 cells/mm(2), and obtained by specular microscopy 3,076 +/- 298, 2,796 +/- 271 and 3,082 +/- 282 cells/m(2), respectively. No statistically significant difference of endothelial cell density between confocal and specular microscopy was found. Endothelial cell count was significantly lower in the automated than in the semi-automated and manual analysis both with confocal and with specular microscopy. In conclusion, endothelial cell count measurements with confocal and contact specular microscopy are comparable. Copyright 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12592045     DOI: 10.1159/000068562

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologica        ISSN: 0030-3755            Impact factor:   3.250


  9 in total

1.  Assessment of a variable frame (polygonal) method to estimate corneal endothelial cell counts after corneal transplantation.

Authors:  S Jonuscheit; M J Doughty; K Ramaesh
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Corneal endothelial cell loss after trabeculectomy or after phacoemulsification, IOL implantation and trabeculectomy in 1 or 2 steps.

Authors:  María I Soro-Martínez; María P Villegas-Pérez; Paloma Sobrado-Calvo; José M Ruiz-Gómez; Jaime Miralles de Imperial Mora-Figueroa
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  In vivo confocal microscopy of the corneal endothelium: comparison of three morphometry methods after corneal transplantation.

Authors:  S Jonuscheit; M J Doughty; K Ramaesh
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  In vivo fibreoptic confocal imaging (FOCI) of the human ocular surface.

Authors:  A P Wells; L Wakely; W Birchall; P M Delaney
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 5.  Imaging the Corneal Endothelium in Fuchs Corneal Endothelial Dystrophy.

Authors:  Stephan Ong Tone; Ula Jurkunas
Journal:  Semin Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 1.975

6.  Comparison of automated vs manual analysis of corneal endothelial cell density and morphology in normal and corneal endothelial dystrophy-affected dogs.

Authors:  Hidetaka Miyagi; Amelia A Stanley; Tanvi J Chokshi; Carina Y Pasqualino; Alyssa L Hoehn; Christopher J Murphy; Sara M Thomasy
Journal:  Vet Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-06-09       Impact factor: 1.444

7.  Corneal endothelial cell density and morphology in Phramongkutklao Hospital.

Authors:  Narumon Sopapornamorn; Manapon Lekskul; Suthee Panichkul
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-03

8.  Fully automatic evaluation of the corneal endothelium from in vivo confocal microscopy.

Authors:  Bettina Selig; Koenraad A Vermeer; Bernd Rieger; Toine Hillenaar; Cris L Luengo Hendriks
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 1.930

9.  Comparison of manual & automated analysis methods for corneal endothelial cell density measurements by specular microscopy.

Authors:  Jianyan Huang; Jyotsna Maram; Tudor C Tepelus; Cristina Modak; Ken Marion; SriniVas R Sadda; Vikas Chopra; Olivia L Lee
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2017-08-07
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.