Literature DB >> 12591634

Functional MR imaging of the auditory cortex with electrical stimulation of the promontory in 35 deaf patients before cochlea implantation.

Anja M Schmidt1, Benno P Weber, Mehdi Vahid, Rene Zacharias, Jürgen Neuburger, Myriam Witt, Thomas Lenarz, Hartmut Becker.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Promontory testing is used for preoperative assessment of the auditory pathway before cochlear implantation. This method depends on patient cooperation and cannot be used in children or disabled persons. Promontory stimulation during functional MR imaging (fMRI) provides a new and objective method to test the integrity of the auditory pathway. To evaluate the method, we performed this prospective study in deaf adult patients.
METHODS: fMRI of the auditory pathway with electrical stimulation of the promontory was performed in 35 profoundly deaf patients, bilaterally in seven. For safe stimulation inside the MR environment, a specially designed nerve stimulator was used. We acquired nine sections parallel to the sylvian fissure by using an echo-planar pulse sequence (1.5 T). To evaluate the number of pixels in the auditory cortex, areas were counted and the minimum confidence level (p(st) value) was determined. The auditory pathway was called intact when the minimal p(st) value was 10(-5) or when the minimal p(st) value was 10(-4) in at least five activated pixels.
RESULTS: Images in 85% of patients reporting an auditory sensation showed activation of the contralateral auditory cortex. In the group of patients reporting no hearing sensation, images in 75% did not show activation.
CONCLUSION: This method can prove the intactness of the auditory pathway and help the surgeon in decision making before cochlear implantation. However, a negative finding should not be interpreted as indicating a nonfunctioning auditory pathway. Additional technical refinements and experience are needed to further improve this method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12591634      PMCID: PMC7974135     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  19 in total

1.  Safe electrical stimulation of the cochlear nerve at the promontory during functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  R Obler; H Köstler; B P Weber; K F Mack; H Becker
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Tonotopic organization of the human auditory cortex as detected by BOLD-FMRI.

Authors:  D Bilecen; K Scheffler; N Schmid; K Tschopp; J Seelig
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Vibration-induced auditory-cortex activation in a congenitally deaf adult.

Authors:  S Levänen; V Jousmäki; R Hari
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1998-07-16       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Activation of auditory cortex during silent lipreading.

Authors:  G A Calvert; E T Bullmore; M J Brammer; R Campbell; S C Williams; P K McGuire; P W Woodruff; S D Iversen; A S David
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-04-25       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Positron emission tomography in cochlear implant and auditory brain stem implant recipients.

Authors:  R T Miyamoto; D Wong; D B Pisoni; G Hutchins; M Sehgal; R Fain
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1999-09

Review 6.  Neuro-functional imaging and profound deafness.

Authors:  E Truy
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1999-02-15       Impact factor: 1.675

7.  Auditory cortex activation in deaf subjects during cochlear electrical stimulation. Evaluation by functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Y Berthezène; E Truy; A Morgon; M H Giard; M Hermier; J M Franconi; J C Froment
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 6.016

8.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging of the central auditory pathway following speech and pure-tone stimuli.

Authors:  S J Millen; V M Haughton; Z Yetkin
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 9.  Functional brain imaging and hearing.

Authors:  L L Elliott
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Comparison of preoperative electrostimulation data using an ear-canal electrode and a promontory needle electrode.

Authors:  A Lesinski; X Littmann; R D Battmer; T Lenarz
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1997-11
View more
  1 in total

1.  Evaluation of Temporal Difference Limen in Preoperative Non-Invasive Ear Canal Audiometry as a Predictive Factor for Speech Perception after Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Saku T Sinkkonen; Lars Kronlund; Johannes Hautamäki; Jussi Jero; Antti A Aarnisalo; Erna Kentala
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2014-02-27
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.