BACKGROUND: Little is known about the effectiveness of interventions to disseminate smoking cessation interventions among a population of primary care physicians. This study's objective was to determine the effect of a community-based academic detailing intervention on the quit rates of a population-based sample of smokers. METHODS: This community-based, quasi-experimental study involved representative samples of 259 primary care physicians and 4295 adult smokers. An academic detailing intervention was delivered to physicians in intervention areas over a period of 15 months. Analyses were performed on the data from the 2346 subjects who reported at least one physician visit over 24 months. Multivariate regression analyses were conducted to determine the impact of the intervention on self-reported smoking quit rates, reported by adjusted odds ratios. RESULTS: Among smokers reporting a physician visit during the study period, there was a borderline significant effect for those residing in intervention areas versus control areas (OR = 1.35; 95% CI.99-1.83; P = 0.057). Among a subgroup of 819 smokers who reported a visit with an enrolled physician, we observed a significant effect for those residing in intervention areas (OR = 1.80; 95% CI 1.16-2.75; P = 0.008). CONCLUSION: An academic detailing intervention to enhance physician delivered smoking cessation counseling is an effective strategy for disseminating smoking cessation interventions among community-based practices.
BACKGROUND: Little is known about the effectiveness of interventions to disseminate smoking cessation interventions among a population of primary care physicians. This study's objective was to determine the effect of a community-based academic detailing intervention on the quit rates of a population-based sample of smokers. METHODS: This community-based, quasi-experimental study involved representative samples of 259 primary care physicians and 4295 adult smokers. An academic detailing intervention was delivered to physicians in intervention areas over a period of 15 months. Analyses were performed on the data from the 2346 subjects who reported at least one physician visit over 24 months. Multivariate regression analyses were conducted to determine the impact of the intervention on self-reported smoking quit rates, reported by adjusted odds ratios. RESULTS: Among smokers reporting a physician visit during the study period, there was a borderline significant effect for those residing in intervention areas versus control areas (OR = 1.35; 95% CI.99-1.83; P = 0.057). Among a subgroup of 819 smokers who reported a visit with an enrolled physician, we observed a significant effect for those residing in intervention areas (OR = 1.80; 95% CI 1.16-2.75; P = 0.008). CONCLUSION: An academic detailing intervention to enhance physician delivered smoking cessation counseling is an effective strategy for disseminating smoking cessation interventions among community-based practices.
Authors: David A Katz; John E Holman; Andrew S Nugent; Laurence J Baker; Skyler R Johnson; Stephen L Hillis; David G Tinkelman; Marita G Titler; Mark W Vander Weg Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2012-11-02 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Judith K Ockene; Karen M Ashe; Rashelle B Hayes; Linda C Churchill; Sybil L Crawford; Alan C Geller; Denise Jolicoeur; Barbara C Olendzki; Maria Theresa Basco; Jyothi A Pendharkar; Kristi J Ferguson; Thomas P Guck; Katherine L Margo; Catherine A Okuliar; Monica A Shaw; Taraneh Soleymani; Diane D Stadler; Sarita S Warrier; Lori Pbert Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2017-11-09 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Sophia Papadakis; Adam G Cole; Robert D Reid; Roxane Assi; Marie Gharib; Heather E Tulloch; Kerri-Anne Mullen; George Wells; Andrew L Pipe Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Carmen Lewis; Michael Pignone; Laura A Schild; Tracy Scott; Andrea Winquist; Barbara K Rimer; Karen Glanz Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-04-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Karen M Emmons; Ann M Stoddard; Robert Fletcher; Caitlin Gutheil; Elizabeth Gonzalez Suarez; Rebecca Lobb; Jane Weeks; Judy Anne Bigby Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2005-06-02 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Suzanne M Miller; Deborah J Bowen; Jennifer Lyle; Melissa Clark; David Mohr; Jane Wardle; Rachel Ceballos; Karen Emmons; Ellen Gritz; Laura Marlow Journal: Cancer Date: 2008-12-15 Impact factor: 6.860