Literature DB >> 12590855

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of moxifloxacin and trovafloxacin for the treatment of acute, bacterial maxillary sinusitis in adults.

J-M Klossek1, R Siegert, P Nikolaidis, P Arvis, M-A Leberre.   

Abstract

In this multicentre, multinational, comparative, double-blind clinical trial, out-patients with both symptoms and radiographic evidence of acute sinusitis were randomly assigned to receive either a seven-day, once daily (o.d.) oral regimen of moxifloxacin (400 mg) or a 10-day o.d. oral regimen of trovafloxacin (200 mg). Among 452 patients considered valid for clinical efficacy, moxifloxacin treatment was found to be statistically equivalent to trovafloxacin (96.9 per cent vs 92.1 per cent -95 per cent CI = 0.6 per cent; 8.9 per cent) at the seven to 10 days post-therapy assessment. At follow-up, the success rate in the moxifloxacin group was 94.9 per cent and that for the trovafloxacin group was 97.6 per cent (95 per cent CI = -4.9 per cent; 1.3 per cent). The predominant causative organisms were Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Staphylococcus aureus followed by Enterobacteriaceae and Moraxella catarrhalis. The bacteriological success rate at the post-therapy evaluation was similar in both treatment groups: 94.4 per cent and 90.1 per cent in the moxifloxacin and trovafloxacin groups respectively (95 per cent CI = -3.0 per cent; 11.9 per cent). Only three of the 103 baseline isolated pathogens still persisted in the moxifloxacin group, whereas there were 10 of the 121 isolates that failed to respond in the trovafloxacin treatment group. At least one drug-related event was reported by 16.9 per cent of the moxifloxacin-treated patients and by 22.3 per cent of those who received trovafloxacin. CNS events such as dizziness and vertigo were reported more than five times more often in patients receiving trovafloxacin than in the moxifloxacin group. Trovafloxacin recipients were also more than twice as likely to discontinue treatment due to adverse events than moxifloxacin-treated patients. Overall, moxifloxacin was at least as effective clinically and bacteriologically as trovafloxacin and better tolerated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12590855     DOI: 10.1258/002221503321046630

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laryngol Otol        ISSN: 0022-2151            Impact factor:   1.469


  9 in total

1.  Deadly Sphenoid Fungus-Isolated Sphenoid Invasive Fungal Rhinosinusitis: A Case Report.

Authors:  Jason E Gilde; Christopher C Xiao; Victoria A Epstein; Jonathan Liang
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2017

Review 2.  Moxifloxacin: a review of its use in the management of bacterial infections.

Authors:  Gillian M Keating; Lesley J Scott
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  The prevalence of bacterial infection in acute rhinosinusitis: a Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Stephanie S Smith; Elisabeth H Ference; Charlesnika T Evans; Bruce K Tan; Robert C Kern; Rakesh K Chandra
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 4.  Safety profile of the respiratory fluoroquinolone moxifloxacin: comparison with other fluoroquinolones and other antibacterial classes.

Authors:  Françoise Van Bambeke; Paul M Tulkens
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 5.  Gender analysis of moxifloxacin clinical trials.

Authors:  Elisa Chilet-Rosell; Ma Teresa Ruiz-Cantero; Ma Angeles Pardo
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 2.681

6.  Characterisation of patients receiving moxifloxacin for acute bacterial rhinosinusitis in clinical practice: results from an international, observational cohort study.

Authors:  Ralph Mösges; Martin Desrosiers; Pierre Arvis; Stephanie Heldner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Uncontrolled penile erection and increased sexual desire with intravenous moxifloxacin.

Authors:  Abdulkadir Kucukbayrak; Zulkuf Perdeci; Zeynep Seckin Kucukbayrak; Ersin Günay
Journal:  Indian J Pharmacol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.200

8.  Eradication of common pathogens at days 2, 3 and 4 of moxifloxacin therapy in patients with acute bacterial sinusitis.

Authors:  Horacio Ariza; Ramon Rojas; Peter Johnson; Richard Gower; Alice Benson; Janet Herrington; Renee Perroncel; Peter Pertel
Journal:  BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord       Date:  2006-04-28

Review 9.  Current management of acute bacterial rhinosinusitis and the role of moxifloxacin.

Authors:  Jack B Anon
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 9.079

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.