Literature DB >> 12590842

Parietal representation of symbolic and nonsymbolic magnitude.

Wim Fias1, Jan Lammertyn, Bert Reynvoet, Patrick Dupont, Guy A Orban.   

Abstract

The close behavioral parallels between the processing of quantitative information conveyed by symbolic and nonsymbolic stimuli led to the hypothesis that there exists a common cerebral representation of quantity (Dehaene, Dehaene-Lambertz, & Cohen, 1998). The neural basis underlying the encoding of number magnitude has been localized to regions in and around the intraparietal sulcus (IPS) by brain-imaging studies. However, it has never been demonstrated that these same regions are also involved in the quantitative processing of nonsymbolic stimuli. Using functional brain imaging, we explicitly tested the hypothesis of a common substrate. Angles, lines, and two-digit numbers were presented pairwise, one to the left and one to the right of the fixation point. In the three comparison tasks, participants (n = 18) pressed the key on the side of the largest quantity. In the three control tasks, they indicated the side on which dimming occurred. A conjunction analysis between the three subtractions (comparison task-control task) revealed a site in left IPS that is specifically responsive when two stimuli have to be compared quantitatively, irrespective of stimulus format. The results confirm the hypothesis that quantity is represented by a common mechanism for both symbolic and nonsymbolic stimuli in IPS. In addition, the interaction between task and type of stimulus identified a region anterior to the conjunction site, not specific for quantitative processing, but reflecting general processes loaded by number processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12590842     DOI: 10.1162/089892903321107819

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  101 in total

1.  The long and the short of it: on the nature and origin of functional overlap between representations of space and time.

Authors:  Mahesh Srinivasan; Susan Carey
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-08

2.  Comparison of length judgments and the Müller-Lyer illusion in monkeys and humans.

Authors:  Oana Tudusciuc; Andreas Nieder
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-10-24       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The neural correlates of intertemporal decision-making: contributions of subjective value, stimulus type, and trait impulsivity.

Authors:  Chandra Sekhar Sripada; Richard Gonzalez; K Luan Phan; Israel Liberzon
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  A model of exact small-number representation.

Authors:  Tom Verguts; Wim Fias; Michaël Stevens
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-02

5.  Size congruity effects with two-digit numbers: expanding the number line?

Authors:  Daniel Fitousi; Daniel Algom
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-03

6.  Frontoparietal cortical activity of methamphetamine-dependent and comparison subjects performing a delay discounting task.

Authors:  John R Monterosso; George Ainslie; Jiansong Xu; Xochitl Cordova; Catherine P Domier; Edythe D London
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Nonsymbolic number and cumulative area representations contribute shared and unique variance to symbolic math competence.

Authors:  Stella F Lourenco; Justin W Bonny; Edmund P Fernandez; Sonia Rao
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Altered neural activity of magnitude estimation processing in adults with the fragile X premutation.

Authors:  So-Yeon Kim; Ryu-ichiro Hashimoto; Flora Tassone; Tony J Simon; Susan M Rivera
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2013-09-02       Impact factor: 4.791

9.  Using cognitive training studies to unravel the mechanisms by which the approximate number system supports symbolic math ability.

Authors:  Stephanie Bugden; Nicholas K DeWind; Elizabeth M Brannon
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2016-05-11

10.  Brief non-symbolic, approximate number practice enhances subsequent exact symbolic arithmetic in children.

Authors:  Daniel C Hyde; Saeeda Khanum; Elizabeth S Spelke
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2014-01-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.