Literature DB >> 12590027

Factor analysis of laboratory and clinical measurements of dyspnea in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Huong Q Nguyen1, Julie Altinger, Virginia Carrieri-Kohlman, Jenny M Gormley, Michael S Stulbarg.   

Abstract

The primary purpose of this study was to determine if there are three distinct factors representing ratings of dyspnea during laboratory exercise, clinical ratings of dyspnea, and pulmonary function in patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (n = 92) using factor analysis. Subjects (mean age 66 +/- 7 yrs; FEV1% predicted 44.7 +/- 14.0) were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups to test the effects of three education and exercise training programs. Outcomes were evaluated at baseline and at 2 months after the intervention. Dyspnea ratings with laboratory exercise (SOB) were measured during incremental (ITT) and endurance (ETT) treadmill tests, and a six-minute walk (6MW) using the modified Borg scale. Clinical measures of dyspnea were measured with the Baseline and Transitional Dyspnea Index (BDI/TDI), UCSD Shortness of Breath Questionnaire (SOBQ), Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale (MRC), Dyspnea subscale of the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ-D), and a global dyspnea question. Pulmonary function parameters included FEV1% predicted, FEV1/FVC, and RV/TLC. The factor analysis yielded three factors that accounted for 58.7% of the total variance in the data: Factor 1, "Dyspnea with Laboratory Exercise" comprised ETT SOB end, ETT SOB isotime, ITTSOB end, ITT SOB isotime, ITT SOB/Time and ETT SOB/Time. Factor 2, "Clinical Dyspnea," comprised 6MW SOB, 6MW SOB/Feet, BDI, SOBQ, MRC, Global SOB, CRQ-D. Measures of airway resistance (FEV1% predicted, FEV1/FVC) and hyperinflation (RV/TLC) loaded on a third factor, "Pulmonary Function." An additional post hoc factor analysis with post-intervention data provided similar results. The Global SOB question and ITT SOB isostage variables were relatively more sensitive to change compared to the other outcome variables. We conclude that pulmonary function, clinical ratings of dyspnea, and laboratory ratings of dyspnea are three separate and independent factors and should be included in the routine clinical evaluation of patients with COPD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12590027     DOI: 10.1016/s0885-3924(02)00690-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage        ISSN: 0885-3924            Impact factor:   3.612


  5 in total

Review 1.  Self-management interventions including action plans for exacerbations versus usual care in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Anke Lenferink; Marjolein Brusse-Keizer; Paul Dlpm van der Valk; Peter A Frith; Marlies Zwerink; Evelyn M Monninkhof; Job van der Palen; Tanja W Effing
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-08-04

2.  Lack of relationship between functional and perceived quality of life outcomes following pulmonary rehabilitation.

Authors:  Stephen P Bailey; Laureen Brown; Elizabeth K Bailey
Journal:  Cardiopulm Phys Ther J       Date:  2008-03

3.  Isolation and identification of nontuberculous mycobacteria from hospitalized patients and drinking water samples--examination of their correlation by chemometrics.

Authors:  Eleni Dovriki; Irini Gerogianni; Efi Petinaki; Christos Hadjichristodoulou; Agelos Papaioannou; Kostas Gourgoulianis
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Physical inactivity in COPD and increased patient perception of dyspnea.

Authors:  Milla Katajisto; Henna Kupiainen; Piritta Rantanen; Ari Lindqvist; Maritta Kilpeläinen; Heikki Tikkanen; Tarja Laitinen
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2012-10-29

5.  COPD phenotype description using principal components analysis.

Authors:  Kay Roy; Jacky Smith; Umme Kolsum; Zöe Borrill; Jørgen Vestbo; Dave Singh
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2009-05-29
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.