Literature DB >> 12589986

The Public Access Defibrillation (PAD) trial: study design and rationale.

Joseph P Ornato1, Mary Ann McBurnie, Graham Nichol, Marcel Salive, Myron Weisfeldt, Barbara Riegel, James Christenson, Thomas Terndrup, Mohamud Daya.   

Abstract

The PAD Trial is a prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical study testing whether volunteer, non-medical responders can improve survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OOH-CA) by using automated external defibrillators (AEDs). These lay volunteers, who have no traditional responsibility to respond to a medical emergency as part of their primary job description, will form part of a comprehensive, integrated community approach to the treatment of OOH-CA. The study is being conducted at 24 field centers in the United States and Canada. Approximately 1000 community units (e.g. apartment or office buildings, gated communities, sports facilities, senior centers, shopping malls, etc.) were randomized to treatment by trained laypersons who will provide either cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) alone or CPR plus use of an AED, while awaiting arrival of the community's emergency medical services responders. The primary endpoint is the number of OOH-CA victims who survive to hospital discharge. Secondary endpoints include neurological status, health-related quality of life (HRQL), cost, and cost-effectiveness. Data collection will last approximately 15 months and is expected to be completed in September 2003.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12589986     DOI: 10.1016/s0300-9572(02)00442-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  8 in total

1.  Two simple questions to assess neurologic outcomes at 3 months after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: experience from the public access defibrillation trial.

Authors:  W T Longstreth; Graham Nichol; Lois Van Ottingham; Alfred P Hallstrom
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2010-02-20       Impact factor: 5.262

2.  The effect of time on CPR and automated external defibrillator skills in the Public Access Defibrillation Trial.

Authors:  Jim Christenson; Sarah Nafziger; Scott Compton; Kris Vijayaraghavan; Brian Slater; Robert Ledingham; Judy Powell; Mary Ann McBurnie
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2007-02-14       Impact factor: 5.262

3.  A paradigm for understanding trust and mistrust in medical research: The Community VOICES study.

Authors:  M Smirnoff; I Wilets; D F Ragin; R Adams; J Holohan; R Rhodes; G Winkel; E M Ricci; C Clesca; L D Richardson
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2018-02-16

Review 4.  Recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Koushik Reddy; Asma Khaliq; Robert J Henning
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2015-05-26

5.  Social and demographic predictors of no transport prior to premature cardiac death: United States 1999-2000.

Authors:  Elizabeth Barnett; Steven Reader; Beverly G Ward; Michele L Casper
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 2.298

Review 6.  Clinical review: Devices and drugs for cardiopulmonary resuscitation -- opportunities and restraints.

Authors:  Max Harry Weil; Shijie Sun
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2004-09-27       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 7.  Review and Outcome of Prolonged Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.

Authors:  Houssein Youness; Tarek Al Halabi; Hussein Hussein; Ahmed Awab; Kellie Jones; Jean Keddissi
Journal:  Crit Care Res Pract       Date:  2016-01-14

8.  Knowledge and attitudes towards cardiopulmonary resuscitation and defibrillation amongst Asian primary health care physicians.

Authors:  Marcus Eh Ong; Susan Yap; Kim P Chan; Papia Sultana; Venkataraman Anantharaman
Journal:  Open Access Emerg Med       Date:  2009-11-16
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.